Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 10-20-2012, 08:50 PM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I'm using 306.23. I have some "flickering haze" when the sunlight hit the proppeler blades in some angles, like in this other video, but nothing that ruins my aim.



The performance is very good, because i recorder this "on the fly" with FRAPS, and the performance without recording is much better.
Im running 306.97, can't imagine that would affect what I see, it could though. I dialed back the cpu to four cores, turned off my OC on the cpu and ran drivers back to the 290 series, but still am not getting the picture you are, quite baffled, it makes little sense to me, I would say even your flight looks smoother with 1 gig of vram than my 3. I've tested my mem, gpu and cpu, and no issues or hickups. Thanks for your input.

Last edited by priller26; 10-20-2012 at 08:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-20-2012, 09:28 PM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

Issue with prof flicker is definitely caused by the sun, if I fly at 20:00 hours, when the sun it almost set, I get no prof flicker whatsoever, is there a way anyone can turn down the intensity of the sun? It seems much more blinding now when compared with screenshots I have of much earlier versions of the game.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-21-2012, 12:06 AM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I'm using 306.23. I have some "flickering haze" when the sunlight hit the proppeler blades in some angles, like in this other video, but nothing that ruins my aim.



The performance is very good, because i recorder this "on the fly" with FRAPS, and the performance without recording is much better.

LoBisoMem, compare your video to mine, same nvidia drivers, 3 gigs vram vs. 1 that you have, and 6 core 1100T compared to your 955 4 core...does your shimmer ever get this bad? Mine is often worse, and rips up the screen. P.s This is taken with Fraps as well.


Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:29 AM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

I will not be pre-ordering or buying on release day based on blind faith.

I'd be happy to buy in if they do one of the following:

Release a demo so we can get a feel for it, or as with DCS, open up beta testing for the price of the final product. I'm very happy with the experience I've had with DCS' P-51.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-21-2012, 01:51 AM
He111's Avatar
He111 He111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 707
Default

I'll probably buy but not straight away, make sure they don't stuff it.

Any lowering of the standard of plane QUALITY or destruction details, is one reason I may NOT buy ..

.
__________________
.
========================================
.
.....--oOo-- --oOo-- HE-111 --oOo-- --oOo--.....
.
========================================
-oOo- Intel i7-2600K (non-clocked) -oOo- GA-P67A
-oOo- DF 85 full tower -oOo- 1000W corsair
-oOo- 8 GB 1600Hz -oOo- 2 x GTX 580 1.5M (295.73)
-oOo- 240 SSD -oOo- W7 64bit
-oOo- PB2700 LED 2560 x 1440 6ms 60Hz -oOo-
========================================
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-21-2012, 02:52 AM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by He111 View Post
Any lowering of the standard of plane QUALITY or destruction details, is one reason I may NOT buy ..

.
People are strange...

If dev team don't "lower" some "quality" we'll not be able to run the game with good performance.

The visuals in first release are amazing, but with HUGE performance hit. Now we have decent performance with good visuals... I miss a lot of "eye candy", amazing explosions, but i want a SIMULATOR, and we need to deal with these things...

I like to play online with a lot of other pilots, and not everyone have high end rigs. And i like perfrormance, because its a COMBAT flight sim, we need fast response.

I really don't know if some people here know a thing about computers and software...

Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 10-21-2012, 03:00 AM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by priller26 View Post
LoBisoMem, compare your video to mine, same nvidia drivers, 3 gigs vram vs. 1 that you have, and 6 core 1100T compared to your 955 4 core...does your shimmer ever get this bad? Mine is often worse, and rips up the screen. P.s This is taken with Fraps as well.


I'm just flying RAF fighters, and i don't have so bad shimmer! Will try tomorrow with the BF and will make a video! It's really bad as I can see!
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-21-2012, 04:34 AM
He111's Avatar
He111 He111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
People are strange...

If dev team don't "lower" some "quality" we'll not be able to run the game with good performance.

The visuals in first release are amazing, but with HUGE performance hit. Now we have decent performance with good visuals... I miss a lot of "eye candy", amazing explosions, but i want a SIMULATOR, and we need to deal with these things...

I like to play online with a lot of other pilots, and not everyone have high end rigs. And i like perfrormance, because its a COMBAT flight sim, we need fast response.

I really don't know if some people here know a thing about computers and software...

That's a stupid comment ..

If they lower the standard then why buy BOM ?? better just to buy 1946, alot cheaper, far more planes, far fewer bugs.

People like CLOD because it sets a higher standard, which people upgrade their computer to match, like Rome 2 and other quality games. Going backwards smacks of desperation and stupidity.

.
__________________
.
========================================
.
.....--oOo-- --oOo-- HE-111 --oOo-- --oOo--.....
.
========================================
-oOo- Intel i7-2600K (non-clocked) -oOo- GA-P67A
-oOo- DF 85 full tower -oOo- 1000W corsair
-oOo- 8 GB 1600Hz -oOo- 2 x GTX 580 1.5M (295.73)
-oOo- 240 SSD -oOo- W7 64bit
-oOo- PB2700 LED 2560 x 1440 6ms 60Hz -oOo-
========================================
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 10-21-2012, 07:03 AM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I'm just flying RAF fighters, and i don't have so bad shimmer! Will try tomorrow with the BF and will make a video! It's really bad as I can see!

Here is my flight in a spit.much different I think than yours.



Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 10-21-2012, 07:44 AM
Robert_s Robert_s is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Default

If I see UBISOFT logo in the game , I definitely will not buy the sequel .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.