Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2012, 06:01 PM
lokitexas lokitexas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SG1_Lud View Post
I had to lie a little bit to give it 5 stars but we need to raise the average, which is unfair.

Thanks for the idea Anders.

S!
Yeah, lie about how this game is good. Thats pretty sad. Everytime I see things like this it makes me cringe. If the game was good to begin with, or after all the "work" was done to it, nobody would need to lie to other people. It should stand on its own merits. It doesnt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DefiantMk1 View Post
ROF has moved on a long way too, for example it has an official dynamic campaign (still in beta and being worked on though) and an unofficial one, plus many more aeroplanes upcoming and even a new Channel map, which is a first for a WW1 sim I think, it is a whole different philosophy over on ROF. Indeed, most negative reviews nowadays stem from either someone buying it not knowing its a simulation, or because they have really terrible Internet connections and cannot download the updates.

CLod has been polished with the new update, but honestly the single player aspect is lacking and only seems to come to life with 3rd parties such as Desastersoft which really seem to show it off very well!

I am interested in what 1C's upcoming news, hopefully they haven't given up and will come out with new ideas on how to keep this franchise going strong into the future.
No, RoF does NOT have dynamic campaign. No, not even the "Beta" career is dynamic, nor is Pat Wilsons Campaign Genterator. Everytime people talk about adding one to RoF Jason gets all upset and closes the thread.

I dont see many more 3rd party campaigns coming for CLoD. The only glimpse of seeing good come from it, is if modders get ahold of it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2012, 09:00 PM
Anders_And Anders_And is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 247
Default

[QUOTE=lokitexas;471038]Yeah, lie about how this game is good. Thats pretty sad. Everytime I see things like this it makes me cringe. If the game was good to begin with, or after all the "work" was done to it, nobody would need to lie to other people. It should stand on its own merits. It doesnt.


Yes and if you want the team to have cash to give you BOM then this is one way... Or dont, but then dont complain if BOM doesnt deliver your expectations...

Its like those people who are too lazy to go and vote and then complain about the politics...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2012, 09:07 PM
lokitexas lokitexas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anders_And View Post

Yes and if you want the team to have cash to give you BOM then this is one way... Or dont, but then dont complain if BOM doesnt deliver your expectations...

Its like those people who are too lazy to go and vote and then complain about the politics...
So, again, lie about the game, and tell people its good? LOL. Pathetic.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2012, 09:11 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Yeah, I'm with lokitexas on this one.

People like you are the reason nobody takes reviews seriously. What you're doing is called "astroturfing" and it's essentially just false advertising.

My life will not be ruined if BOM bombs.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-19-2012, 11:10 PM
Anders_And Anders_And is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles View Post
Yeah, I'm with lokitexas on this one.

People like you are the reason nobody takes reviews seriously. What you're doing is called "astroturfing" and it's essentially just false advertising.

My life will not be ruined if BOM bombs.
Hahaha humour!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2012, 11:38 PM
Novotny Novotny is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 355
Default

I'd recommend the game to anyone interested in flight sims as I think it's quite good.

But then, they're fully aware of it anyway. All 2 of them. And they have it already.

This game is not going to get better, nor sell any more copies other than a desultory few per month that might pay for the bandwidth you twats use up arguing with each other.

Look to Moscow - and when I say look to Moscow, I don't mean create endless threads about how you, a bus-driver from Luton, would/could have done it better.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-20-2012, 12:09 AM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lokitexas

I dont generally like the +1 , but in this case....+1

Ben
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2012, 07:34 AM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Unhappy

[QUOTE=Anders_And;471132]
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokitexas View Post
Yeah, lie about how this game is good. Thats pretty sad. Everytime I see things like this it makes me cringe. If the game was good to begin with, or after all the "work" was done to it, nobody would need to lie to other people. It should stand on its own merits. It doesnt.


Yes and if you want the team to have cash to give you BOM then this is one way... Or dont, but then dont complain if BOM doesnt deliver your expectations...

Its like those people who are too lazy to go and vote and then complain about the politics...
The BoM team have already had their funds allocated. The only thing that buying CoD would do now is line the coffers of 1C / Ubi of which they would most likely direct the funds to other things.

I'm not saying buying CoD would be bad, but it's very unlikely to directly help the team. CoD is now a finished product, maybe not what we want it to be, but it's done.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.