Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2012, 06:30 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *Buzzsaw* View Post
I haven't seen your data card JtD, but it is a lot later in the war, much equipment could have been added by August of 1941, I think the plane was not used except as a recon by then, and in any case, 6793 lbs is still a long way under the 7284 lbs which the game is showing as the maximum.
I agree. I would consider 6793lb the absolute upper limit and also only applicable if the in game variant has got the armour. About 300lb lighter appear reasonable for earlier variants, which corresponds to the weights listed for the test plus ~130lb for full fuel and oil. The date on the card does not mean it is supposed to represent service condition of Hurricanes as in 1941, the plane's still listed with 8 guns. The tare weight increase when compared to the test is 250lb.

The data sheet is available for everyone here.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2012, 06:46 AM
trademe900 trademe900 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 186
Default

Respect and very nice find.

The game Hurricane handles like a fricken whale and can't out-turn spitfire or 109. It is not nice natured either. Needs MAJOR attention please!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2012, 07:15 AM
*Buzzsaw* *Buzzsaw* is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
I agree. I would consider 6793lb the absolute upper limit and also only applicable if the in game variant has got the armour. About 300lb lighter appear reasonable for earlier variants, which corresponds to the weights listed for the test plus ~130lb for full fuel and oil. The date on the card does not mean it is supposed to represent service condition of Hurricanes as in 1941, the plane's still listed with 8 guns. The tare weight increase when compared to the test is 250lb.

The data sheet is available for everyone here.
The extracted game files shows 427 liters or 94 gallons as max. fuel load, so your data card's figure of 97 gallons is not being used.

The TARE weight of the Hurricane IA Rotol with bullet proof windshield and armour plate used in the RAF test was 4982 lbs/2265 kgs, which is 744 lbs less than the TARE weight of the game aircraft which is listed as 2603 kgs/ 5726 lbs.

RAF Test link again:

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...ane/l2026.html

Scroll down for weights of 'overload' aircraft. (6750 lbs)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2012, 07:27 AM
trademe900 trademe900 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 186
Default

Also, real hurricane rotol takes 8 minutes to get to 17,000, in game it takes 12 minutes! the real hurricane in 12 minutes can get to 22,000 ft. Also the climb rate above 17,000 is shocking.

In addition, the dh5-20 is faster than the rotol to climb, which should be the complete opposite.

This is all totally unacceptable in my opinion.

Last edited by trademe900; 10-05-2012 at 07:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2012, 07:45 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

I can't disagree with the perfomance issues. I can't see the weight of the pilot's seat armour and IFF included anywhere (73lbs) not that it would answer all the questions.

EDIT: IvanK, when I do my tests I adjust the fuel load to get the same weight as the historical data tests.

EDIT2: to avoid confusion I meant I can't see the pilot armour weight and IIF equipment in the Buzzsaw/game data. I'm sure it would have been in JtDs figures.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders

Last edited by klem; 10-05-2012 at 08:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2012, 08:02 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Here is the second weight summary for the Hurri report.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2012, 08:23 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *Buzzsaw* View Post
The extracted game files shows 427 liters or 94 gallons as max. fuel load, so your data card's figure of 97 gallons is not being used.
97 gallons is the fuel tank capacity, of which 94 gallons are useable. Usually the 3 unusable gallons are included in the tare weight.
Quote:
The TARE weight of the Hurricane IA Rotol with bullet proof windshield and armour plate used in the RAF test was 4982 lbs/2265 kgs, which is 744 lbs less than the TARE weight of the game aircraft which is listed as 2603 kgs/ 5726 lbs.
4982lbs is the weight of the aircraft without bullet proof windshield and armor. These items were not actually fitted, but the plane was ballasted instead and the extra weight is included in the service load.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2012, 09:18 AM
flyingblind flyingblind is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 255
Default

Very interesting. One point which might be worth considering is whether the real life weight includes a pilot. If not then the game weight would need to be a little heavier to allow for this although you would be unlikely to have a 700lb guy sat in the seat!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2012, 09:48 AM
winny winny is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,508
Default

Just for reference - 1 gallon of British fuel weighed 7.2lb (Spitfire - The History)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2012, 03:35 PM
Catseye's Avatar
Catseye Catseye is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 242
Default

Whew, gotta cut down on the beer and sausage!

Good find guys. The devil certainly is in the details. 1C have indicated in the past that they model on real specs. Hopefully they will get to them before the final patch.

Cheers

Last edited by Catseye; 10-05-2012 at 03:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.