4-12 wish list (Merged)

[Ala13_Kokakolo]

Sorry for bother again, but there is one from the list of sugestions I would like a word from Daidalos and it is about engine temperatures. Is there any plans of get even more realistic this IL2 aspect? I mean, as I explained in a previous post, in the current situation the lower temperatures of the engine (i.e. long descent with cowling flaps open in a winter map) has no impact on the engine. I am not asking for a "plane by plane" acurate behaviour, a more "one fits all" will make me a happy man.

[T}{OR]

Here are two of mine:

• Tighter AI formations for heavy bombers (i.e. B-17s and B-24s)
• Elimination of the irritating wing over or flip over effect every time a plane flies over a WP.

[Mysticpuma]

Just in case it's already possible in QMB but I missed it.....is it possible or could we have the player not always lead the flight and maybe be No.2 (wingman) or 3 or 4 in the flight?

Currently I am always the leader unless I go into FMB? So it would be great from the drop-down menu to have a switch in Aircraft Customisation (where you choose the skins) to have a switch that lets you choose which is the Players plane?

Cheers, MP

[martinistripes]

Originally Posted by martinistripes

@TD Any chance you can release 4.12 complete as a one stop download. I know community members have bundled them together previously but it would be great to have the whole lot compiled officially.

Obviously, I realise an incremental patch is still needed for modders that want to switch back and forth between various versions.

I posted this in Update Discussion and Feedback, but it probably belongs here.

[Spudkopf]

Originally Posted by Mysticpuma

Just in case it's already possible in QMB but I missed it.....is it possible or could we have the player not always lead the flight and maybe be No.2 (wingman) or 3 or 4 in the flight?

Currently I am always the leader unless I go into FMB? So it would be great from the drop-down menu to have a switch in Aircraft Customisation (where you choose the skins) to have a switch that lets you choose which is the Players plane?

Cheers, MP

+1

[SPAD-1949]

Originally Posted by Spudkopf

+1

+1

[DD_crash]

Any chance of more than 4 controllers?

[1984]

Originally Posted by IceFire

What visual external differences existed to fit the second ShVAK? Any pictures? I'm curious if nothing else.

oh, sorry, i use only main sources (some books and tables) and only now again read one "fresh" monograph about 9 - more pictures of yak-9p vk-105pf here...

well, really, difference is gunport and little another geometry of nose part without blister for UBS...

it's too much for ignore of changes or no, don't know now, anyway, it's choice of DT...


and little more about production of early yak-9 (yak-9 1942 in game) -

До конца 1942 года Новосибирский завод N 153 выпустил лишь 59 новых «Яков», большая часть из них и попала на фронт под Сталинградом.

in 42 only 59 from 459...

so, maybe, really need for lot of 9's with perfomance'42 (2870 kg - 515-520 km/h at SL - 17.5-18.5 sec - 5.1 min/5000), perfomance'43 (2870 - 530-540 - 17 - 4.9/5000)...

something like this, ONLY if early yak-9s in 43 have 2 fuel tanks in wing and not be yak-9d in fact with more fuel tanks (so, i can be wrong, when some days ago write about yak-9 1943... too much details here)...

anyway, early yak-9 with better perfomance can be etalon or plane with very good quality (i think so)...

[Tolwyn]

Please see this post:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=265

[302_Corsair]

Hello all.

Could you make undercarriage legs more accurate in Tomahawks?



These in game are to long or the dampers are to hard.