Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2012, 09:43 AM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm of When View Post
I never said it involved Jason buying out 1C who I know are a massive set up, I meant if perhaps he could acquire the IL2 franchise from Maddox games, I didn`t think it would be necessary to spell it out in full but I guess the finer points of the English language may not be obvious to the non English.

We suspect Jason either wouldn`t or couldn`t anyway, but if you want a fine example of how a dev involves himself with the community then Jason is a prime case, wow he even goes and answers questions on the forum, his team fixed a dog of a game and his set up continues to release 300+mb patches on a regular basis and thanks the purchasers for supporting his efforts.

So to put it in an easy to understand way, Maddox Games (if it`s still called that) could learn a lot from how the RoF team support and approach their community, if the reader is so blind that they deny thats fact then I`m obviously pissing in the wind.
You must of missed the ROF turmoil when it was also released "unfinished" albeit not as "unfinished" as COD was. Jason bought into ROF after the game engine was finished and now has a very good idea what the game engine can accomplish, so he can answer questions and provide updates with confidence. At the moment Luthier doesn't have that luxury, the much more complex COD game engine still requires alot of work. Even if Jason was able to buy COD months ago, it would not have been possible for him to confidently say what the future would hold for the sim, nevermind meaningful updates. That said the future of COD and the new IL-2 series will be told soon enough, they are running out of time.
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8
Asus PT6 Motherboard
6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600
Asus GTX580 Direct CU II
60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it
500gig HD Dual Boot
Samsung 32"LG 120hz
MSFF2 Joystick
Cougar Throttle
Saitek Pro Rudder pedals
Voice Activation Controls
Track IR 5 ProClip
  #2  
Old 09-28-2012, 10:02 AM
Storm of When Storm of When is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 93
Default I was involved in the Beta of RoF Chivas

I do remember Chivas, none of us could believe it when they said the Beta was over and they were releasing it, it was a bomb site full of bugs. I think they`ll fix this game at some point, but they need a better public face which costs nothing.
  #3  
Old 09-28-2012, 11:54 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
the much more complex COD game engine
Really? How do you know it's MUCH more complex than the ROF engine?
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
  #4  
Old 09-28-2012, 12:10 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Manu View Post
Really? How do you know it's MUCH more complex than the ROF engine?
I think it's because 777 have stated the limitations of their engine. They (apparently) have limitations with the top speeds and achievable heights of modelling in the atmosphere. A ROF flying mate told me, so don't shoot the messenger. It could be rubbish though, I'm interested to hear the truth though myself.
  #5  
Old 09-28-2012, 01:11 PM
Lurker_71 Lurker_71 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
I think it's because 777 have stated the limitations of their engine. They (apparently) have limitations with the top speeds and achievable heights of modelling in the atmosphere. A ROF flying mate told me, so don't shoot the messenger. It could be rubbish though, I'm interested to hear the truth though myself.
Also, RoF has a nasty fundamental flaw in how it models cross-winds effects. (in short, cross wind rolls the aircraft). Jason acknowledged it, and said there's nothing they can do to fix it, short of a whole rewrite.

Big flaw indeed for what is otherwise an excellent flight sim.
  #6  
Old 09-28-2012, 02:43 PM
6S.Tamat's Avatar
6S.Tamat 6S.Tamat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
I think it's because 777 have stated the limitations of their engine. They (apparently) have limitations with the top speeds and achievable heights of modelling in the atmosphere. A ROF flying mate told me, so don't shoot the messenger. It could be rubbish though, I'm interested to hear the truth though myself.
Funny because all the aircrafts in cod can't reach theirs ceiling, to not talk about clouds and meteo.
On the other side the complexity is growing with the new water simulation that rof is implementing.
After more than a year of "development " in my personal point of view the complexity of the sim is not either a good excuse or the reality. Something badly programmed is cot complex, it is only bad job.
__________________
  #7  
Old 09-28-2012, 03:16 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

For some reason this whole customer relationship reminds me of this sketch.



Watch it all... every bit is relevant, especially the end

  #8  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:45 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #9  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:55 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
Oh everything is just perfect now.. how silly of us all. You are right and 90% of the community where talking crap as usual.

Lets see how things progress before you bath in your own self appointed smugness eh.
  #10  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:09 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
LOL! I almost feel sorry for Ace, he thinks that when luthier pops his head in once every 6 months for a patch announcement that equals "good customer relations". It's sad really.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.