![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
because to get a "highly acurate" verical angle of climb/descent you need an INS or a pretty good attitude indicator and they did not have neither of these back then on the other hand your "inquietudes científicas" generate pretty interesting posts ![]()
__________________
Intel i7-2600K // Asus Maximus IV Extreme Rev3 // 2xGTX580-3GB (SLI'ed when able) // 16 GB DDR3 // SSD // HDD WD 10K // Win7 x64 // LG monitor 24´´ 1920x1200 res |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a pilot I can say I haven't really noticed any wobbly oscillations of a VSI ... ever. Atmospheric pressure variances do not occur with the great horizontal or vertical rapidity that would be required to make it do so. Remember, it's just a bourdon tube with a calibrated leak.
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By the way, the same scientific maffia introduced gyro scop driven artificial horizon, while a glass of water is a good reference for horizontal in daily experience...
__________________
Details: Asus P5BE Plus / Q9650, 3.0 GHz ---- Win 7 - 64 / 4 GB RAM ---- ATI 4890, 1 GB VRAM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try the glass of water in a turn and you will see why this principle is not used
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() well i admit i was wrong if it works dont cahnge it though find it surprising, i guess they dont oscilate to the price of precision
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just totally ignore me...
I guess you guys were not there......................................... mazex - what about that radar / command fighter thing your too busy to work on? any news? Last edited by 5./JG27.Farber; 09-21-2012 at 10:08 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dangit, you beat me to it! This video demonstrates that non-aerodynamic (simple relative mass * gravity systems) do not give correct readings of attitude and roll. Precession, while annoying for sure, is *extremely* minor when compared to this. Gyroscopes can be re-centred using balance magnets, negating the effects of precession anyway.
To answer Raaaids initial question, I ask you "how would you, using as simple a device as possible, figure out what components of any vertical incoming air is wind (which can be much faster than 20km/h (~5ms^-1) at higher altitudes) and what is the climbing rate." Remember that in normal flight (i.e. when you are actually looking at the climbing rate gague) you climb or descend at ~2-5 thousand feet per minute which is ~25.5ms^-1, not too different from your conservative estimation of wind. Also, using a pressure based system, pressure changes by ~33hPa per thousand feet, whereas the most brutal low fronts will change pressure by 10-15hPa over the course of several hours. Small variations in pressure at ground level have surprisingly large effects, so it's easy to forget that by climbing in an a/c you travel through a huge range of pressures. Last edited by SQB; 09-22-2012 at 05:50 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well you make a mechanism that makes this calculation:
airspeed*cos pitch angle=climbing rate if your going at 500kph and theres a vertical wind of 20 kph your making an error in just that your real speed will be the hipothenusa of the rect triangle: 20-500-x so then your horizontal airspeed would be maybe 490 with which the error would be minimum also planes have artificial horizonts to know your picth angle edit: doesnt actually a gyro artificial horizont also go crazy in hard manoubers?
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"doesnt actually a gyro artificial horizont also go crazy in hard manoubers?"
Depends on the gyro system. If its a full 360 degree in pitch and roll it works just fine no matter what you do. Few if any in WWII would have had this capability though. |
![]() |
|
|