Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2012, 03:10 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kristorf View Post
The questions are easy to see, ditto with the insults.

It's just appears to show the usual contempt the paying customer is held in today.
From what I have seen on this forum the contempt is well deserved.
  #2  
Old 09-17-2012, 03:18 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

Well...you reap what you sow, David.
  #3  
Old 09-17-2012, 03:31 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudfark View Post
Well...you reap what you sow, David.
Yes, you do. Who do you think is going to produce a good WW2 flight sim if you force this team out of business?
  #4  
Old 09-17-2012, 03:56 PM
msalama msalama is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
...if you force this team out of business?
Eagle Dynamics perhaps?
  #5  
Old 09-17-2012, 04:02 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by msalama View Post
Eagle Dynamics perhaps?
Why haven't they done it?
  #6  
Old 09-17-2012, 04:00 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Yes, you do. Who do you think is going to produce a good WW2 flight sim if you force this team out of business?
You couldn't mean me? I bought (into) it on April 16, 2011, 3 months before
the U.S. release and two days after I joined this forum.

Pretty tough to force anybody to do anything on the interweb.
Proof of that? The last 18 months here. Waiting.
  #7  
Old 09-17-2012, 04:05 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudfark View Post
You couldn't mean me? I bought (into) it on April 16, 2011, 3 months before
the U.S. release and two days after I joined this forum.

Pretty tough to force anybody to do anything on the interweb.
Proof of that? The last 18 months here. Waiting.
18 months of complaining and insults. Eventually I would expect them to reconsider their dedication to producing a game for people who have nothing but contempt for them.
  #8  
Old 09-17-2012, 04:10 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

That's called taking care of business.
Or, business taking a turn.

Which it has.

This ain't a marriage...it's a deal.
Apparently, maybe, a deal breaker.
We'll all know, by the end of the day.

I hoping for a positive outlook.
You?
  #9  
Old 09-17-2012, 04:17 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudfark View Post
We'll all know, by the end of the day.

I hoping for a positive outlook.
You?
I doubt the patch is going to be ready by the end of the day.
  #10  
Old 09-17-2012, 03:39 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Hayward said:

Quote:
From what I have seen on this forum the contempt is well deserved.
(I'll bite, since I forgot to log-in and so Ignore not working...)

Absolutely. You may want to consider in which direction, and who the recipient is.

Quote:
Many of the "questions" were just thinly disguised insults.
As are many, if not all, of the reactive 'commentariat' remarks.

This forum has many different levels of insult, from the carefully deployed and implied, to the overt. The high-ground is great, but the game itself occupies the low ground. Lording it over such a disaster is never going to work. It would onyl work if the game invited high praise and a uniform respect - it doesn't, sadly.

Last edited by Falstaff; 09-17-2012 at 03:46 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.