Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2012, 11:33 AM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RegRag1977 View Post
Why not start with a good old Ki44 instead?
Yes, exactly. Oleg and his team had a penchant for exotic stuff, that's why we got BI-1, BI-6, Go-229, He-L-IIIB2, I-185 (which, by the way, serves only as a stand-in for the Ki-44), I-250, MiG-9protoF-2, Ta-183 and other oddities - but not, for example, Hawker Typhoon. I really hope that DT will continue filling gaps in historical ranks, rather than produce more oddities.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2012, 02:02 PM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

I hate the Ta153 and the Lerche
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2012, 08:31 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagarto View Post
Yes, exactly. Oleg and his team had a penchant for exotic stuff, that's why we got BI-1, BI-6, Go-229, He-L-IIIB2, I-185 (which, by the way, serves only as a stand-in for the Ki-44), I-250, MiG-9protoF-2, Ta-183 and other oddities - but not, for example, Hawker Typhoon. I really hope that DT will continue filling gaps in historical ranks, rather than produce more oddities.
That, and probably 10 billion email messages from people begging for "Luftwaffe 1946" stuff which historically never made it beyond sketches on the backs of napkins, produced by engineers desperate to avoid getting conscripted into the Volkssturm, but which allegedly would have won the war for the Nazis in some alternate universe.

Also, to be fair, a number of projects didn't make it into the game due to failures by third parties. I think that the Typhoon was one of those casualties.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2012, 12:39 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
Also, to be fair, a number of projects didn't make it into the game due to failures by third parties. I think that the Typhoon was one of those casualties.
Bingo.. there was great enthusiasm from many different people but for various reasons only some of those third party efforts ever made it to the stage where they could be incorporated into the game. There was a time when aircraft were reserved and this created a situation where someone would be reserved for an aircraft for long periods of time but without anything getting to the finishing stages.

It was never done maliciously. It just worked out that way. People get busy and life gets in the way. BUT... a great number of third party projects did make it into the game later on as well and we've got some great variety because of that.

New planes arriving all the time... but a Typhoon I would love to see. The Normandy map is definitely missing a key piece without it.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2012, 03:29 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Bring on the Tiffie !!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-14-2012, 03:08 PM
Orangeman Orangeman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighterace View Post
Bring on the Tiffie !!!
Yes a Typhoon would be great!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2012, 05:28 PM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

Actually, Ki-44 is a great choice. It came as a shock to Chennault's fighters in China, beating Warhawks at their own game, booming & zooming them at will.
By the way, was there any consideration within DT to make a map of south-east China, roughly the area marked on the map I've attached? Unlike many PTO battlefields, this one was active for at least three years.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg China.jpg (573.3 KB, 43 views)

Last edited by Lagarto; 09-14-2012 at 05:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-14-2012, 05:30 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I am in constant longing for just that map.

__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2012, 11:33 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagarto View Post
Actually, Ki-44 is a great choice. It came as a shock to Chennault's fighters in China, beating Warhawks at their own game, booming & zooming them at will.
By the way, was there any consideration within DT to make a map of south-east China, roughly the area marked on the map I've attached? Unlike many PTO battlefields, this one was active for at least three years.
A Ki-44 is high on my list as well. Really interesting and non-typical Japanese fighter for the time. Pilots initially didn't like it but some seemed to be quite successful later on... particularly against the P-40s and early P-51A models when they were first deployed.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-16-2012, 02:34 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagarto View Post
Actually, Ki-44 is a great choice. It came as a shock to Chennault's fighters in China, beating Warhawks at their own game, booming & zooming them at will.
By the way, was there any consideration within DT to make a map of south-east China, roughly the area marked on the map I've attached? Unlike many PTO battlefields, this one was active for at least three years.
There's a mod version of the Ki-44, with several variants, which is pretty good. I'm not sure it's quite up to DT standards, though.

As for maps of China, there's a modded Hankow and Taiwan/Formosa map which are reasonably good, but still not quite good enough. A few years back, someone did a number of "starter maps" for most of China, but these are nothing more than crude imports of STRM data, with no attempt to correct mistakes or add roads and the like.

The main problems with doing maps of China are very different terrain types and the fact that most areas of China are heavily populated.

The first issue is a massive limitation, because IL2 maps can only have two types of ground textures per map. So, map makers either have to make smaller maps or put up with unrealistic looking terrain on part of the map.

The second issue means that map-makers need to spend lots of time putting in roads, villages and railroads. And, it's a balancing act as to how much "civilization" you add, since lots of buildings reduce frame rates.

Another issue, somewhat unique to China, is that the major rivers in China were historically prone to extensive flooding, meaning that the terrain looked very different at different times of the year. During WW2, the Chinese also deliberately breached levee systems to deny territory to the Japanese, so areas which appear to be protected by levees on maps were actually flooded.

Finally, almost no other part of the world has seen as much change and population growth as China. Modern STRM data of the area will not accurately model the landscape as it was 60 or 70 years ago, and terrain images from Google Earth won't accurately depict the look of the terrain as it was then.

This means it's impossible to make realistic-looking maps of large areas of China, and very hard to create realistic-looking historical maps of specific areas. To do it right, you'd need to have at least 6 different maps of China, and even then that wouldn't cover the entire country!

This isn't to say that I wouldn't be thrilled to have such maps, just that it's not an easy project!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.