Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-25-2012, 06:36 AM
Allons! Allons! is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
Default

PLEASE dont let them fiddle with TrackIR its already not optimal so no need to get this worse..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2012, 08:59 AM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Head mvmt was already implemented and it was good.

A lot of players complained about the difficulty to get a good view of the visor (and that was true). But it gave a good sensation of G forces acting on the pilot.

However I like your idea of blinking ring to give an indication of the pilot fatigue. May be some lines of code could be implemented as well to reflect it according to your proposal with muscular fatigue : pull 5G for X minute and your pilot response will be sluggish.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2012, 09:12 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Anyway, with TiR or not, the strenght of the force needs to be visible to the player.

About the outer circle in the new version my idea was:
- transparent => no loss of stamina
- yellow => light loss of stamina
- red => moderate loss of stamina
- blinking red => high loss of stamina

Of course the ranges are dinamic: it's not the force on the plane, it's the one on the pilot whose posture in cockpit and G-suit really influence the effects on the body.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 07-25-2012 at 09:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-25-2012, 09:14 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Some documents:

http://spacemedicineassociation.org/...1956/27003.pdf
http://csel.eng.ohio-state.edu/voshell/gforce.pdf
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.