![]() |
|
Technical threads All discussions about technical issues |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PLEASE dont let them fiddle with TrackIR its already not optimal so no need to get this worse..
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Head mvmt was already implemented and it was good.
A lot of players complained about the difficulty to get a good view of the visor (and that was true). But it gave a good sensation of G forces acting on the pilot. However I like your idea of blinking ring to give an indication of the pilot fatigue. May be some lines of code could be implemented as well to reflect it according to your proposal with muscular fatigue : pull 5G for X minute and your pilot response will be sluggish. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyway, with TiR or not, the strenght of the force needs to be visible to the player.
About the outer circle in the new version my idea was: - transparent => no loss of stamina - yellow => light loss of stamina - red => moderate loss of stamina - blinking red => high loss of stamina Of course the ranges are dinamic: it's not the force on the plane, it's the one on the pilot whose posture in cockpit and G-suit really influence the effects on the body.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 07-25-2012 at 09:15 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some documents:
http://spacemedicineassociation.org/...1956/27003.pdf http://csel.eng.ohio-state.edu/voshell/gforce.pdf
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
![]() |
|
|