Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #471  
Old 07-24-2012, 10:03 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post

I meant to add, the reason I believe this is the effect is because the only Weight and balance diagrams I have seen of the Spitfire place the fuel tank moment just behind the datum point, as fuel reduces then the moment weight is offset by the constant moment weight of the engine which I think we can all agree is ahead of the datum.
You've probably seen a doc related to the AFT mounted tank of the spitfire, scarcely used on fighters but primal on the reco version.
  #472  
Old 07-24-2012, 10:04 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
You've probably seen a doc related to the AFT mounted tank of the spitfire, scarcely used on fighters but primal on the reco version.
No it was the diagram on this thread, and let's face it, if the fuel tank was forward of the datum then the Spitfire could not have possibly been unstable, so in this case I am argueing 'for' your cause.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #473  
Old 07-24-2012, 10:50 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

If the early Spits were so tail heavy then why did the MkVIII have 22.5lb added (weight and mount) to the tail? moment arm 175.5"
  #474  
Old 07-24-2012, 10:59 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles View Post
Go back and read the thread; it's all there. This thread has devolved into fanboys re-interpreting the presented evidence into "merely a slight" instability because their egos can't handle it, so I'm not going to perpetuate it.

Ta ta
So a NACA engineer is a Spit fanboy?

"FIGURE 4.5. Supermarine Spitfire airplane. A high-performance fighter noted for its role in the Battle of Britain and throughout WW II, the Spitfire had desirably light elevator control forces in maneuvers and near neutral longitudinal stability. Its greatest deficiency from the combat standpoint was heavy aileron forces and sluggish roll response at high speeds. "

Some fanboys have a short memory.
  #475  
Old 07-24-2012, 11:29 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
I know this is going to sound rather foolish but can someone point me in the direction of the test report that mentions 3/4 in of travel for 3 G.

Its in here somewhere but I cannot find it, any hunts welcome
Page 9 of the NACA report:



One report not yet mentioned is the Spitfire VA Stalling Characteristics by NACA: Where the Spitfire II Pilot's Notes warn about buffeting at the stall NACA sees this as "Good Stall Warning" and the Spitfire's stall characteristics "more desirable in some respects than those of any pursuit-type airplanes formerly tested in a similar manner.":





The main undesirable characteristic noted was the "uncontrollable rolling instability" with the gun ports open and in a steeply banked turn.

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 07-24-2012 at 11:49 PM.
  #476  
Old 07-24-2012, 11:40 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Interesting, thanks typhoon, the boxed extract sounds almost identical to what Mark Hanna was describing.

Quote:
The main undesirable characteristic noted was the "uncontrollable rolling instability" with the gun ports open and in a steeply banked turn.
It also adds that there was 'unmistakeable' warning in the form of buffet.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition

Last edited by bongodriver; 07-25-2012 at 07:38 AM.
  #477  
Old 07-25-2012, 01:48 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
You just don't have the evidence that that is actually what happened for a start
Ahh....

You can look at the slope of the Cm/CL curve.....

Ahhh, elevator oscillation graphs....


Ahhh, Abrupt pull up characteristics.....

Elevator angle / Acceleration / stick force graphs....

It is very cut and dry. No emotional involvement required.

Here is the stick travel requirement the Spitfire did not meet.....

You guys need a copy of the report?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Stick Travel.jpg (121.4 KB, 10 views)
__________________

Last edited by Crumpp; 07-25-2012 at 01:51 AM.
  #478  
Old 07-25-2012, 01:51 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

While CG location will effect the stall velocity, stall behavior is not stability.

It is apples and oranges.

"Being flown" in the stall buffet is not the same as "turns great in the stall buffet" either.

Carry on
__________________
  #479  
Old 07-25-2012, 02:55 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

An ode to stability and buffet with apologies to Plt Off Gillespie Magee

Oh How I thought I'd slipped the surly bonds of earth
I've danced and rolled and slipped and pulled and done a thousand things
I pulled once more .....Buffet flick ... oh no the lift has gone from my wings.

My Spit MKI yawed and clanged and bucked and pitched

The stability of this Spit MKI is such a bitch !

This I fear must be a spin

Time for me to put my best effort in.

I pulled the throttle back to Idle

I centralised the controls as I had been taught
Its times like these that things get a little fraught

I smoothly pushed on opposite rudder

But my Spit MKI she continued with the judder

I eased the stick progressively forward

smoothly smoothly son and you will get your reward.

And then it happened out she popped

All the banging and the clattering had stopped
as 90 degrees nose down my Spit MKI had flopped

But there I was at even lower Alt so very close to the heather.

Time for me to pull my best turn ever

But what should I do ?

Alas I had no clue

A fervent prayer to Crumpp Patron saint of the NACA

Surely he will guide me through this delicate matter

"Pull smoothly lad but don't let it Buffet" said Crumpp

I did as I was told ....... until I felt the fatal Thump
Impact ! .........bummer .....I was in the Hawkinge dump.

And that was that I was dead

I knew I shouldn't have listened to what got in my head

Now I really had slipped the surly bonds of earth

Up and up I went until there I was nearing heaven listening to the mirth.

When I got there what did I see ?

A raucous bunch of forum guys all from 1C

One by one they began to chant .... "Another victim of Turning room available is less than turning room required"

I hung my head in shame .... how could I have been so dumb? ..... How could this have transpired ?

At last a sign of hope, along he came Pontius ..... the world famous Pilate

Take heart young man .... my advice and gift today will make you smile a lot

The trick is to pull until you feel the "buzz" then hang on to it like glue

Only this young lad will keep you out of the Poo.
and now a gift .... a second chance at life for you.

In flash there I was 90 degrees nose down over Hawkinge

Time to do my stuff .... no time to grumble or to whinge

I smoothly pulled to the Buzz... Pilates words ringing in my ears like a bell

Boy o boy my Spit MKI she is turning well
And then there I was above the ground .... Gee that was swell.
Good on you Pontius your advice today has done me well.

So pilots all if you want to turn

pull to the buzz ..... lest you burn
Dont always listen to a Boffin
That just might lead you to a coffin.

And to the mods out there

its time to put this all to bed
please please .... close this bleeding thread !
  #480  
Old 07-25-2012, 03:23 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
While CG location will effect the stall velocity, stall behavior is not stability.

It is apples and oranges.

"Being flown" in the stall buffet is not the same as "turns great in the stall buffet" either.

Carry on
So I guess that your comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Spitfire Mk I Operating Notes, July 1940.

What do you think the "violent shudder" is.....hint....PRE-STALL BUFFET.


and those that you posted on the PN's are worthless to this discussion and not worth bothering with? I take it the NACA report on the Spitfire's desirable stall behaviour was wrong because according to you the PNs say otherwise? Thanks for contradicting yourself again Crumpp...
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.