Another pointless poll...

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by zapatista

wrong

their paid beta program is also a success, and would have avoided the storm of -ve publicity CoD generated on release (and something people like tree-uk never had the IQ power to comprehend), it was either the broken beta we got (and yes, was sold to us as a completed game, and that was the mistake) or NOTHING. having, and tolerating still, the perpetual clique of selfish whiners hasnt created ANYTHING positive to improve the outcome, if anything it has worsened our problem.

+2

[[URU]AkeR]

Why do you keep comparing with ROF. I played the game for 1 week and never touched it again. Yes it performs better than COD. But the "feel" didnt seem right. I prefer COD with graphics to medium and low, and no trees, but with a better feel of flight and air combat.

COD platform will keep improving, removing its flaws, and eventually I will be able to buy better hardware. But ROF should be done all over again to change how it feels.

Dont get me wrong it is a beautifull game, and probably use it if i had more time, but right now most of my time goes to IL21946, and the rest to COD

[von Pilsner]

Originally Posted by [URU]AkeR

Why do you keep comparing with ROF. I played the game for 1 week and never touched it again.

Agreed, the RoF engine can not handle many ground objects, it would not be better for CloD to use that old DX9 engine.