|
|
|
|
#1
07-16-2012, 11:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Understood Papafly, but the N is still a bit heavier than the E which is faster than the N in the numbers I have ready at hand.
Odd.
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov 
|
|
#2
07-16-2012, 12:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmmm, maybe a difference in trim drag?
As long as we don't have reliable top speed figures we can only speculate...
|
|
#3
07-19-2012, 08:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
HyperLobby Stock 1946 "Kiwi@War" =============================================== Dell MB i7 860 @2.80ghz 8gb GB_Nv550Ti OC 1gb SB Audigy Saitek X45 Saitek Trottle Quadrant SSD Boot, SAS Raid Data
|
|
#4
07-25-2012, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd always recommend these pages:
http://www.raafwarbirds.org.au/targe...e/p40_data.htm http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/P-40/P-40.html
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
