I Refuse To Fly WW2 CoD German Aircraft. Why?

[MadBlaster]

reality check. none of the planes are german. everything in the game is russian. made by russian "programmers" that work for a russian software company. if you "kill" a pilot, he's russian and his name is luthier. if you "bomb" a town, it's ubisoft or steam headquarters somewhere in russia. if you meet up with a disconnect pilot online, his name is oleg. if you see a total newbie online, his name is bee-sex. if you see some white beeeaches, that's where the E3 russian babes hang out, with the game's beancounters and investors, drinking chivas regal all day long wondering where their $8 millions dollars went. so fly low and think of what could have been. i mean, you are an investor too! you paid for the game. probably also had to pay to upgrade your computer to make it "workable". now, do you want to get your monies worth out of it? or do you want the russians to steal it from you? or is "london, england (not european)" more important. he he. no euro cooties for you. lol. really, ever since invention of modern day transportation, its been worldwide socialist orgy-fest. the internet, making the party all the bigger. the lowest common denominator in play and can't be stopped. we all going down the toilet like clod. you know the song. "diarrhea...people think it's funny, but it's really hot and runny...etc.” that's the world now. turd soup. same as clod. yum, yum, can I have another? sure. hear’s some bom for you. tell me now you still feel guilty after getting pooped on.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by Hood

Nice attempt to hijack the thread to post your rather skewed ideas though.

Hood

you've given that a real good go yourself

[mazex]

Amazingly I read all of the posts in this thread...

I was on a conference where Jan Eliasson spoke some month ago (the newly assigned Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations). He said a lot of interesting stuff but what stuck was that he talked about the fact that every war that has started in history started with people misunderstanding each other - and not listening to the other side...

This thread is a good example...

[RCAF_FB_Orville]

I understand them perfectly well. They, however, do not understand us.

Dishonour not your Mothers.

[RCAF_FB_Orville]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

I would say its quite typical of the British mindset that they developed in their colonial wars. They thought themselves to be superior to anyone else, but when their arrogance fails against a superior military force on the battlefield, they tried terror on the enemy population.

Harris tried exactly that - and he failed. What he DID achieve is getting the best educated younger British men killed and drive his country bancrupt with the staggering costs of Bomber Command's ultimately ineffectual terror offensive.

[5./JG27.Farber]

Originally Posted by mazex

Amazingly I read all of the posts in this thread...

I was on a conference where Jan Eliasson spoke some month ago (the newly assigned Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations). He said a lot of interesting stuff but what stuck was that he talked about the fact that every war that has started in history started with people misunderstanding each other - and not listening to the other side...

This thread is a good example...

Words of wisdom.

[bongodriver]

It could all have been so simple, Hitler could have annexed the parts of Europe he wanted, the French could have had a humiliation and Hitlers Empire would have been a Jew/Pole/non aryan/other ethnic groups/mentally ill/disabled/other phisically challenged persons free eutopia, we all know he would have stopped there and tried to live in peace with his reluctant neighbours, but 'oh no!' those blood thirsty Brits just couldn't see it his way, we just couldn't make time to listen to him.

[arthursmedley]

Originally Posted by mazex

Amazingly I read all of the posts in this thread...

I was on a conference where Jan Eliasson spoke some month ago (the newly assigned Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations). He said a lot of interesting stuff but what stuck was that he talked about the fact that every war that has started in history started with people misunderstanding each other - and not listening to the other side...

This thread is a good example...

Er.....just off the top of my head, North Korea invading South Korea in 1950, Hitler's invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, the Soviet invasion of Finland in 1940, the German invasion of Norway, Denmark and Holland in the same year, the Italian invasion of Abyssinia in '36. There didn't seem to be any evidence of misunderstanding or confusion, they were straight acts of deliberate armed aggression.
However, I'm now confused. Is this a thread about how people think when they play games or is this a thread about the origin's of the second world war?

[5./JG27.Farber]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

It could all have been so simple, Hitler could have annexed the parts of Europe he wanted, the French could have had a humiliation and Hitlers Empire would have been a Jew/Pole/non aryan/other ethnic groups/mentally ill/disabled/other phisically challenged persons free eutopia, we all know he would have stopped there and tried to live in peace with his reluctant neighbours, but 'oh no!' those blood thirsty Brits just couldn't see it his way, we just couldn't make time to listen to him.

Haha!

Just for the record please remember I did say Germany's invasion of Poland to regain its land there was over the top!

Tin hat on - check!

Ok so what about American which went to war against its constitution?

[arthursmedley]

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

Haha!



Tin hat on - check!

Ok so what about American which went to war against its constitution?

It did? When was this then?