Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-15-2012, 11:06 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOA_Potenz View Post
but release the patch without it, most of the user aren't DX9ers, that part of the players can keep waiting for a bit more, but is unfair keep up us all waiting for and outdated tech for a few that doesn't want to update systems
Since the final patch will have DX9 support, it also has to be beta tested. So, why make two different patches, instead of making one for both DX versions and then using the spare time to fix other things: radio comms, AI, FMs, etc?

I really do want that patch and i hope they'll give the bombers some love now that we have a thread collecting bug reports about them, but i prefer to get a proper patch instead of band-aid fixes.

What i also don't get is how the same "it says so on the box so i want acceptable FPS" crowd is now going around telling people that "it doesn't matter what it says on the box". Pure hilarity.

In truth, if we decide the system requirements on the box don't mean anything, then they should not bother with fixing anything at all...not only DX9, but anything else. It says such and such card and above on the box, doesn't it? That includes all the DX10 and DX11 cards, right?

However, we want them to fix it. And that means delivering everything of what was advertised, including DX9 support.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Dear Moderators,

Can we have a separate thread where people can ask why they are supporting DX9 and where we can continue to reply each time?

Thanks

I'm seriously contemplating it to be honest. There's a bunch of encouraging stuff in this update and all we get again is focusing on the ONE thing that is not as likeable.

It's not completely off-topic yet because DX9 is mentioned in the update. However, if it moves to detailed specifications on DX versions and DX user statistics, i'm definitely creating a new thread and moving all related posts there. I'll check again tomorrow and see how things are going in that regard.

Also, if certain people don't calm down soon, expect the post to be temporarily locked for clean-up and removal of posts that only serve the purpose of deliberately irritating each other.

This is not everyone's personal "let me vent my frustrations thread". If anybody wants such a thread create one in the pilot's lounge and knock your socks off (all can have their say as long as it's respectful to others and in the appropriate forum section), but don't drag this one through the mud or i'll do the same to your posting privileges. I think i'm making this as clear as can be.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:01 AM
Volksieg Volksieg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Berkshire UK
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post

What i also don't get is how the same "it says so on the box so i want acceptable FPS" crowd is now going around telling people that "it doesn't matter what it says on the box". Pure hilarity.
LOL Yep. I really, really wish it didn't say DX9 on the box but people saying it doesn't matter what is on the box is walking on pretty dangerous ground.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2012, 01:23 AM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

What most people seem to have forgotten is that the latest beta patch we are currently running does NOT support DX9.

Or maby its already been mentioned.

Last edited by Baron; 06-16-2012 at 01:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-16-2012, 07:16 AM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
What most people seem to have forgotten is that the latest beta patch we are currently running does NOT support DX9.

Or maby its already been mentioned.
That's really a non-issue because to install the beta patch you would have to do it manually, and understand why it's a beta and not official. The average Steam user that isn't a staple at these forums is still running the last official patch that does work somewhat in DX9.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-16-2012, 09:27 AM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
That's really a non-issue because to install the beta patch you would have to do it manually, and understand why it's a beta and not official. The average Steam user that isn't a staple at these forums is still running the last official patch that does work somewhat in DX9.

I was only referring to the debate about "they MUST support DX9 cuz the box says so", if its a beta release they don't. They can hold of the DX9 support as long as they care to as long as its not an official/steam patch release. There is absolutely nothing that indicates that this patch is going to be a official release right of the bat.

I might have missed something though.

Last edited by Baron; 06-16-2012 at 09:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-16-2012, 09:52 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Al those " i want, i want, i want...." posts would be funny if the wouldn't communicate the disrespect of those posters towards the less fortunate which are stuck with Windows XP for various reasons.

Sad as this is, its a mirror of the western meritocracy.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-16-2012, 10:29 AM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I dunno what this has to do with the meritocracy (which I personally prefer over mediocricy any time) so please elaborate.

I also suggest that you put away your computer, do not use tab water and only feed on one meal per day because there are people on this planet that cannot afford a computer nor have running water. Some even have difficulties to feed on one meal per day ... *rolleyes*
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.