Man Made Global Warming

5./JG27.Farber · #1 06-01-2012, 05:37 PM

How do you know that David?

David Hayward · #2 06-01-2012, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

How do you know that David?

First of all, there is no definitive model.

Second of all, that isn't how science works. They don't just ignore important factors when trying to figure out what is happening.

The statement was complete bullshit on every level.

5./JG27.Farber · #3 06-01-2012, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Hayward

First of all, there is no definitive model.

Second of all, that isn't how science works. They don't just ignore important factors when trying to figure out what is happening.

The statement was complete b****** on every level.

No definative model? We were talking about taking into consideration as many factors as possible. They have ignore relevant factors, thats the whole point!

AndyJWest · #4 06-01-2012, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

No definative model? We were talking about taking into consideration as many factors as possible. They have ignore relevant factors, thats the whole point!

And you know this how?

5./JG27.Farber · #5 06-01-2012, 05:53 PM

Because carbon emissions do not corolate with global tempreture...

David Hayward · #6 06-01-2012, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

No definative model? We were talking about taking into consideration as many factors as possible. They have ignore relevant factors, thats the whole point!

No, the point is that there Dyson is demanding a definitive model when he knows full well that it is not possible to make such a model.