Why still no dive acceleration difference?

[Crumpp]

3-blade Hamilton standard 6507A-2 on P47D, efficiency varies from 83%-63% when TAS is between 0.25-0.7 Mach.

Not in the envelope of the aircraft. It is a CSP.

[BlackBerry]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

Not in the envelope of the aircraft. It is a CSP.

CSP could maintain constant efficiency roughly when speed of propeller tip is below 0.85. Please check 3-blades efficiency curve, when advance ratio is far greater than 2.2, namely when prop tip is approaching 1 Mach, the story changes. A CSP will lose efficiency inevitably at high speed diving(a/c noise louder and louder).

Btw, CSP will also lose efficiency when TAS is very very low.

[Crumpp]

CSP could maintain constant efficiency roughly when speed of propeller tip is below 0.85. Please check 3-blades efficiency curve, when advance ratio is far greater than 2.2, namely when prop tip is approaching 1 Mach, the story changes. A CSP will lose efficiency inevitably at high speed diving(a/c noise louder and louder).

Btw, CSP will also lose efficiency when TAS is very very low.

You are correct but don't misapply it as it has little bearing on the game shapes in IL2.

The efficiency is nearly constant in any portion of the envelope that design can sustain flight....

That is the beauty of a CSP.

The very nature of power producers is such that the faster they go, the less thrust they produce. The reverse is also a characteristics of power producers. The lower the velocity, the more thrust they produce. That efficiency drop occurs because the propeller blades are stalled just like in very high speed flight. The reason is different but believe me, both realms, high and low speed, produce stalled blade portions. In the low speed realm, we are looking at speeds at taxi and the first part of take off but our thrust force is extremely high at low velocity. Therefore, in the scheme of things, it is a useless detail to include the reduction in efficiency in a dive. The performance is not sustainable in the first place and our reduction in thrust with velocity is already well approximated by:

Crumpp says:
Take the force triangle for a dive. A component of weight contributes to thrust based on the angle of dive. The difference between the force on the axis of motion in the dive and the force on the axis of motion for level flight is your initial excess force that will move the aircraft to its new equilibrium point velocity. The derivative between that and equilibrium is your average excess force along that vector....

In other words, the details are included when you make the standard assumption of .85 efficiency.
You could also incorrectly conclude that all subsonic propeller theory violates the very definition of lift because it does not include the fact lift force develops at right angles to the relative wind. This means that in all propellers, regardless of blade stalling will not produce thrust. Why? As the velocity increases the relative wind gradually shifts and eventually lift produced by our propeller no longer parallels the flight path but is deflected upward.
Fortunately we don't have to do that or at least we would not be adding any accuracy by deriving our own approximation of the effect. It is one more thing rolled up in our standard formulation.

[BlackBerry]

The efficiency is nearly constant in any portion of the envelope that design can sustain flight....

That is the beauty of a CSP.

Crumpp, this thread is about DIVE, in a high speed dive, you can easily reach very high TAS which, of course, you can not sustain. Finally, as you pull out of dive and begin to level, the aircraft will slow down to its max. level speed, isn't it? The late dive peroid is a temporary flight process in which you may have 25% efficiency advantage over your opponent bacause both propellers could not maintain constant efficiency(85%), namely your 4-blade prop get 80% and your enemy just have 55%, this is a huge tactic factor. Forthermore, from dive terminal speed to max. level speed, that is the slowdown peroid, you still have efficiency advantage. So how long is your advantage peroid? 40seconds? 1 minute? It depends on your altitude to dive from. You are bleeding his energy in this peroid even if your enemy is the best pilot in the world! You are stealing his energy for 40 seconds by the "hand of God". Now you can run away with ease, out of his shooting range. This is called "OUTDIVE".

The very nature of power producers is such that the faster they go, the less thrust they produce. The reverse is also a characteristics of power producers. The lower the velocity, the more thrust they produce. That efficiency drop occurs because the propeller blades are stalled just like in very high speed flight. The reason is different but believe me, both realms, high and low speed, produce stalled blade portions. In the low speed realm, we are looking at speeds at taxi and the first part of take off but our thrust force is extremely high at low velocity. Therefore, in the scheme of things, it is a useless detail to include the reduction in efficiency in a dive. The performance is not sustainable in the first place and our reduction in thrust with velocity is already well approximated by:

As I said above, if you are stealing 500HP from your enemy for 30 seconds, he loses "hundreds meters altitude" energy! Imagine that in a il2 combat you decrease throttle to 65% for 30 seconds, that's suicide.

In a high speed flight, a little thrust will give you a lot power, don't forget:

Power=thrust*speed

It is output power not thrust determines your energy state.

[MadBlaster]

come on now. 30 seconds...40 seconds??? in la7 or tempest or whatever, you cruise at 3000 meters then enter dive, it takes just few seconds to hit max level speeds and few seconds more to hit max dive speeds. not that long.

[Crumpp]

As I said above, if you are stealing 500HP from your enemy for 30 seconds

Who is stealing 500 hp???

How much excess excess thrust does a P47 have at 20,000 feet in level flight at Vmax?

NONE

How much excess thrust does any propeller airplane have at Vmax?

NONE

If our airplanes Vmax is 420mph EAS and we dive to Vne at what speed does our Excess Thrust produced by the Propeller = 0?

Vmax

How much Excess power does a CSP propeller aircraft have from cruise flight to Vmax to devote to a dive excess thrust?

All of the excess thrust produced to Vmax...at Vmax our excess propeller thrust = ZERO

What speed does a CSP equipped aircraft traveling at cruise flight reach zero excess propeller thrust at in a dive?

At Vmax....the same speed as in level flight

What is the design propeller efficiency for a CSP in an aircraft envelope from Vs to Vmax?

n = .85 from Stall to Vmax

[MadBlaster]

Crumpp, that doesn't seem quite right based on the diagram you posted a few pages back. Peak efficiency 2.2 at Vmax. but, you can still move down and to the right of the curve towards less efficient (advance ratio increasing for a given blade pitch) as the tip speeds increase and approach mach??? As long as the efficiciency value is > zero, don't you have some thrust being produced by the propellar?

edit:
referring to post #143.

[BlackBerry]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

Who is stealing 500 hp???

How much excess excess thrust does a P47 have at 20,000 feet in level flight at Vmax?

NONE

How much excess thrust does any propeller airplane have at Vmax?

NONE

If our airplanes Vmax is 420mph EAS and we dive to Vne at what speed does our Excess Thrust produced by the Propeller = 0?

Vmax

How much Excess power does a CSP propeller aircraft have from cruise flight to Vmax to devote to a dive excess thrust?

All of the excess thrust produced to Vmax...at Vmax our excess propeller thrust = ZERO

What speed does a CSP equipped aircraft traveling at cruise flight reach zero excess propeller thrust at in a dive?

At Vmax....the same speed as in level flight

What is the design propeller efficiency for a CSP in an aircraft envelope from Vs to Vmax?

n = .85 from Stall to Vmax

I've got your logic, Crumpp. If you still believe that engine could NOT provide excess thrust in a high speed dive, simply shut down your engine. There is a saying:

After loses only then understood treasures.

[BlackBerry]

Originally Posted by MadBlaster

come on now. 30 seconds...40 seconds??? in la7 or tempest or whatever, you cruise at 3000 meters then enter dive, it takes just few seconds to hit max level speeds and few seconds more to hit max dive speeds. not that long.

Come on, when my Tempest MKV dives to deck and level fly reaching 780km/h, how long will it take to slow down my Tempest to 600km/h? Only just few seconds?

Are you kidding me?

[MadBlaster]

it depends on what dive angle you took after you turned off your engine at Vmax level and entered your dive. if the dive angle was steep enough, you will continue to accelerate due to gravity. if it is too shallow a dive angle, you will start to slow down. in the latter case, if you are below Vmax in the dive due to too shallow a dive angle and turn on your engine, you have potential excess thrust to tap into and get more acceleration from your prop. However, if you are above Vmax because your dive angle was steep, turning on your engine won't give more acceleration because you can not create excess thrust from your propeller at that point. Your TAS is too high. You are moving down and to the right on your efficiency/advance ratio curve for the given blade angle. Any excess thrust is coming from your dive angle/gravity. When your TAS is high enough that you get no thrust, you should lower your rpms to reduce your drag profile, provided you still have room to your Vne speed.

Come on, when my Tempest MKV dives to deck and level fly reaching 780km/h, how long will it take to slow down my Tempest to 600km/h? Only just few seconds?

Umm, who is chasing who here? Tempest has much more dive room than LA7. Push it to ~ 850 kph in your dive extension and zoom climb out from there. Don't waste the zoom energy to 600 kph unless your exiting the fight. Also, Tempest performs better at lower alt.

Face it BlackBerry, Crumpp won.