![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Plus jet engines, plus swept wing, makes indeed 3. However you asked for those only that are still in todays designs, and thats two, jet engine and swept wing. So here we go again: 3 in total minus 1 not in current designs anymore equals 2 still in current designs. That's the 2 I mentioned. 3-1=2 Does that make sense to you? Just read what I wrote. You asked for those that were still around. I can't add the third one in the list. Quote:
You just put your head in the sand. Quote:
That's just plain silly. Because every pane will be a dead end sooner or later then. Like the F-86. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_F-86_Sabre Know of any plane of recent design that has engine intake at the front of the fuselage? Nope, so dead end design. On top of that they put those outdated 0.50 caliber on that plane. A fighter plane with 0.50 cal guns in 47, imagine, what a dead end design! Two wings and a prop, dead end design as no more fighter of today have it: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4139/4...6fd35c6c_z.jpg Have seen any shoulder wings on a new fighter design lately? No? So this is another dead end: http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../2/1505224.jpg And one day the stealth drone will turn all manned combat planes into dead end designs. http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/...e_1427413i.jpg Boy, this is getting really silly. +++++ |
|
|