Busy Building whilie I wait

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by Luftwaffepilot

If they don't drop DX 9 support with BoM they're simply stupid.

Way to go with yer statement there. Tell them how it is done.

[Continu0]

Originally Posted by carguy_

Way to go with yer statement there. Tell them how it is done.

Have to agree on dropping DX9 support. If they want to use this engine for the next 10 years, they have to be on the top of technology today...

[ATAG_Snapper]

Originally Posted by Continu0

Have to agree on dropping DX9 support. If they want to use this engine for the next 10 years, they have to be on the top of technology today...

Agree. As I've read elsewhere, 1C has to honour its commitment to support Win XP/DX9 in Cliffs of Dover for existing customers. I don't believe any such commitment was made for BoM. As a layman (I'm no programmer nor sim designer) it would just make sense to have the current CoD playable for DX9 by completing as many fixes as possible for it and declaring it "done". To make both camps happy perhaps license a 3rd party like Disastersoft to include some GOOD campaigns. Meanwhile, work could continue in earnest on the "CoD Heavy Duty/BoM" engine. As customers, we could be confident that if it works well in Cliffs of Dover Heavy Duty, then it's worth spending the bucks for Battle of Moscow. Knowing this, I would be willing to ante up the cash for BoM, as would most others in the CoD/IL2: 1946 community.