![]() |
|
Technical threads All discussions about technical issues |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the info guys so, avoid the Sandforce controllers and do not worry about multiple writes (pagefile).
Sounds good ![]() Thanks ~S~ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But yeah, I always thought SSD's were always suited to notebooks and laptops especially, next to nothing power consumption and no moving parts for a mobile platform ![]() In time I'll replace my new laptops HD with an SSD. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Good to know. I was more concerned about the limitation of writes on the chip (especialy with WinXP). It seems it is not the problem. I am still unsure. I already have a 40Gb SSD in one of the small notebooks I use when I travel but I find it too small. So, I end up always carrying my 1Gb MyPassport with me (and connecting it). For the same money I would pay for a 120Gb SSD, I could install a 500Gb HDD inside = No more need to carry external HDDs. Life is a b... ![]() ~S~ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() http://www.scan.co.uk/products/ocz-o...-year-warranty One things for sure though, SSD's lend themselves to Laptops and Notebooks very well, low power consumption while on battery's, and no moving parts. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, some feedback:
I tried an OCZ 60GB SDD SATA with WinXP. I liked it, very light and very low power consumption but I was annoyed by the little free space. Then I put in a 320Gb 7200rpm HDD, upgraded to 4Gb RAM and installed Win7-64bit and some 150Mb of Win7 specific notebook tools (the ones I had before were for WinXP). Jesus, that is fast now!!!!! I will never say anything bad about Bill Gates again...LOL So I will stick with the 320Gb HDD it has enough space for me (I also have a 600Gb 7200rpm HDD but I am too lazy to re-install). I know, I should try now to install Win7-64 to the 60Gb SSD and see how the performance is but I am too lazy and, it is the hard disk space that was important for me so the 60Gb SSD would have been too small for the task anyways. Summary: Win7-64bit it seems it does make a difference! Thanks for all the advice Igo kyu and Katana! ~S~ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Samsung 830 series is fast enough, a good buy for the money and Samsung has made a really good controller, which is even better than current sandforce, etc. drivers in "all-day-using".
Fast read-write perfomance on the box of a card is measured on generic tests/benchmarks, which do not happen in real life. In real-life usage, the Samsung are currently top edge! Top edge means not, that they are the best, but in current setups, currently used Sata, etc. Samsung did a great job. I have mine for 4 months now and I am very happy, although I have an old mainboard, which only gives me SATA 300 speed. But in real-life usage, the SATA 600 sure gives u more performance, but in most situations, you are fast enough with SATA 300. I just said that, if someone has a SATA 300 as well (it is not so bad to have it plugged in SATA 300 until you get a new mainboard). So, my recommeded SSD is currently the Samsung 830 series (256 GB i would say) with good controllers, which are currently forcing the other big brands to rework in their middle class range to reach the same! But nevertheless, nearly every SSD is fast enough, that u really feel it ![]() Last edited by Stublerone; 05-20-2012 at 10:18 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|