@B6: How far down the road is official SLI support?

[Stublerone]

I just say to everyone asking me: Warning! Shit idea with sli!!!Warning!!!

Just waste of time, resources, performance, money...even for triple monitoring.

As long as sli isn't working 100% which is technically not possible atm, better drive with a good single gpu. No advantage from memory, no advantage elsewhere!
Only for guys, who want to waste time in finding solutions to play instead of just playing. Please never upgrade your system with sli with the intention to safe money. It is simply a bad idea. The nerd guys with sli do not buy sli, because they need it. They just buy it to max out the limit to show others. It is their hobby to show balls in hardware. They will never buy older cards to upgrade system. So: As long as the general idea of sli will be done on other ways and with other intention(e.g. For using one gpu for one monitor seperately), it will never get satisfying. There are simply too much ideas and too much possibilities, which they would like to offer. That is, why it simply never reaches a single gpu like performance.

Just my opinion. If techniques do not change, it will not get satisfying. And you can theoretically do a quad sli with some 560's and CloD will not run much faster than before.

[Stublerone]

Just edit: Doesn't it sound strange, that your SLI is using 95% vram on both cards with 3gb each? You can simply see: With 2 lower cards with 1500 mb vram, you will be again bottlenecked, as u cannot use the other vram. Not very effective and that is, why sli isn't providing a way better performance on smaller sli rigs as desired.

And this is VERY often the case in games, that it do not take advantage of the vram. Normally the guys do not see it, as current games are not using a lot mor than 1 GB vram. But this is waste ...

[ATAG_Septic]

Originally Posted by Stublerone

Just edit: Doesn't it sound strange, that your SLI is using 95% vram on both cards with 3gb each? You can simply see: With 2 lower cards with 1500 mb vram, you will be again bottlenecked, as u cannot use the other vram. Not very effective and that is, why sli isn't providing a way better performance on smaller sli rigs as desired.

And this is VERY often the case in games, that it do not take advantage of the vram. Normally the guys do not see it, as current games are not using a lot mor than 1 GB vram. But this is waste ...

I try not too risk a disagreement on the 1c forums but; The memory is not wasted if both GPUs are using it. Half of it would be wasted if you are not using SLI (and have two GPUs) as each GPU only accesses its own Vram.

I do of course know this to be true because I read it on the internet

Cheers,

Septic.

[Stublerone]

What i wanted to say: Smaller cards are sufficiently using their vram.

A correction from my side concerning this: As cards are getting larger vram, multi gpu can be used without any limits, because every card has enough. Smaller cards in current sli state are less efficient, because they get bottlenecks and up to now and with current techniques, it will not change very soon.

That is why I always suggest not to upgrade with sli. Perhaps this changes, but i bet, that it will take several more years to take it into consideration without these doubts. I was not referring to your system, because you have too much reserves. U just can see, that it is not efficiently scaled and this is often the case.

Concerning sorround: New nvidias also have them ready for surround gaming, but sorry: I am also an nvidia guy normally, but when you talk about sorround gaming, eyefinity is the betterbsolution and ati cards are performing way better in high resolutions by nature. So, we have to wait for the real kepler to evaluate their behaviour.

Up to now, the 680 dies against 7970 in high res or better say ultra hgj res with triple monitor setup.

[von Pilsner]

Originally Posted by Stublerone

I just say to everyone asking me: Warning! Shit idea with sli!!!Warning!!!

Just waste of time, resources, performance, money...even for triple monitoring.

As long as sli isn't working 100% which is technically not possible atm, better drive with a good single gpu. No advantage from memory, no advantage elsewhere!
Only for guys, who want to waste time in finding solutions to play instead of just playing. Please never upgrade your system with sli with the intention to safe money. It is simply a bad idea. The nerd guys with sli do not buy sli, because they need it. They just buy it to max out the limit to show others. It is their hobby to show balls in hardware. They will never buy older cards to upgrade system. So: As long as the general idea of sli will be done on other ways and with other intention(e.g. For using one gpu for one monitor seperately), it will never get satisfying. There are simply too much ideas and too much possibilities, which they would like to offer. That is, why it simply never reaches a single gpu like performance.

Just my opinion. If techniques do not change, it will not get satisfying. And you can theoretically do a quad sli with some 560's and CloD will not run much faster than before.

OK, so how do I get nVidia surround without a SLI config?

[BigC208]

Originally Posted by von Pilsner

OK, so how do I get nVidia surround without a SLI config?

GTX680 to the rescue! Bought one a month ago. Turned my three landscape oriented 1680x1050 monitors around so now they're portrait. Hooked em all up to the gtx680 and voila! When I ran a single monitor (1600x1200, 22 inch crt)I had the the graphics set to the highest setting and consistently ran between 65 and 85fps. Now with Nvidia surround at 3352x1680 (custom bezzel correction resolution) I'm getting around 45-55 fps. The GTX680 also fixes the lack of good AA. FXAA looks very good and does not give a performance penalty.

[von Pilsner]

Originally Posted by BigC208

GTX680 to the rescue! Bought one a month ago. Turned my three landscape oriented 1680x1050 monitors around so now they're portrait. Hooked em all up to the gtx680 and voila! When I ran a single monitor (1600x1200, 22 inch crt)I had the the graphics set to the highest setting and consistently ran between 65 and 85fps. Now with Nvidia surround at 3352x1680 (custom bezzel correction resolution) I'm getting around 45-55 fps. The GTX680 also fixes the lack of good AA. FXAA looks very good and does not give a performance penalty.

Very nice setup! I am still using SoftTH at the moment for mine (cause my middle monitor is wrong native resolution) but I hope to get a new monitor next month (so I can properly enable nVidia surround). I noticed that when I check SLI support in Rise of FLight I get a fps boost even though I am not 'technically' in an SLI config at the moment so multi GPU support is working well for me in most games.

From: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/N...Force_GTX_690/
The GTX 690 has two GK104 Kepler GPUs arranged in an internal SLI configuration.

Thanks, but again that is using SLI technology... (although it is doing it on the card itself) I don't have any problems with my setup I was just responding to someones assertion that I can have nVidia triple head without SLI....

[Slayer]

Originally Posted by von Pilsner

OK, so how do I get nVidia surround without a SLI config?

A 680GTX or GTX 670 will run multimonitor now with only 1 card...

[Stublerone]

Just what I wanted to say. A single card can run it, too. Just be aware, that vram can get a bigger issue. So it is n1 to have them.

By the way: BigC: What is your card consuming in terms of vram. Does it get hick ups sometimes due to the small memory? This should be the case, as your setup should easily consume about 2,5GB vram. When you have hick ups, how big are they or how do they look like practically. Just for my information.

[von Pilsner]

Originally Posted by Stublerone

I just say to everyone asking me: Warning! Shit idea with sli!!!Warning!!!

Nobody was asking you...

You are the guy who jumped into the SLI request thread to tell us our gear is shit... Obvious you are just trying to start a fight. Too bad the moderators are cool with this kind of behavior.