Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey
Vote for bug 174 (link in sig)
I am pretty sure it is correct. Remember that these are modelled from data supplied from RAE that was using 87 octane fuel. The 100 octane (12lbs) modell is considerably faster and not modelled (refer to my bug link
The test supplied was for propellers I believe, lots of different data on the trialled props.
|
What I see is that the current Mk1a is closer to the test graph up to 6000m but the patch will impose an unecessary reduction in the speed - that is what I don't understand.
So why make it slower when it is more or less correct to 6000m and the problem was the dip above 6000m (which will be corrected) or am i missing something here?
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE
AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor.
Last edited by SEE; 04-24-2012 at 04:14 PM.
|
04-24-2012, 04:11 PM
Threaded Mode