![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for posting BS, as already requested - which line for the Spit Mk1a is the patch?
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good point, they are the same colour.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Given that most fighting tends to happen below 6,000m, the current game is closer to the flight tests than the patch.
__________________
i7 930 @ 4.0 GHz - 6 Gig ram @ 1600 - AMD 6970 2 gig Win 7 64 bit on 1st HDD (7200rpm) - Steam on 2nd HDD (7200rpm) TrackIR 3 with vector exp - MSFF2 - Native res 1680 x 1050 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Comparing the other "post"-patch graphs I'd say it's the one that has slower speed below FTH. The in-game graphs seem to have a sharper edge at the FTH than the real-life tests.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Its the bottom one. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
oh....crap! Ah well, I have always preferred to be at 55000+ in MP - I can stop whinging once I get to that altitude!
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
The reference graph seems to be based on N. 3171.
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/n3171.html http://www.spitfireperformance.com/n3171speed.jpg |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I changed graphs
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Weeeeee I was right!
..and so on the 2nd day Black six did come down from on high to mount 1C where he did give the common people two more tablets... and it was entered in the book of CloDo... and there was much rejoicing! Until later when there was a violent secular clash in which many threads and posts were dismembered and slaine... |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you BS, but I am confused why the devs have generally reduced the Spit Mk1a speed in the next patch given that it is already slower than the flight test data?
I don't understand that at all.
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor. |
![]() |
|
|