Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2012, 08:38 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Greetings Banks. Good snippets in para IV excerpt especially.

These are however from the Generic or Pilots Notes General (AP2905) so arn't specific to the Spitfire installation. Though I do see your point there. I am trying to find these sections in my copy of the AP2095 (2nd addition dated April 1943) but so far cant... I guess thing s changed between the early and second versions.
Yes the 1st Edition from June 1940 is much shorter and only deals with propeller and supercharger handling.

Quote:
Same goes for the discussion of excessive rich mixture for Take off boost its a generic statement. In short I believe it a discussion on Mixture use versus Boost but not an indication of a specific systems design.
I agree. It doesn't support my statement very well. However a higher mixture might explain the difference between +12.5 "take off" and +12 "emergency".

Quote:
Reading the Spit II notes I see what you are saying about 2 systems. The manual states in the take off section that max boost can be obtained by pushing past the gate no mention is made of the Boost Cutout switch in this circumstance. So I agree with you here and I was incorrect. So the gate gives +9Lbs. Pushing past the gate on Takeoff will give you +12.5Lbs but with ABC still operative.
Yes that's the way I see it. It is however stated that "take-off" boost also disables the boost control, so basically it seems to do the same thing as the cut-out only by a different "button".
I wonder why the "early" limitations give +12 for takeooff and the "later" limitations give +12.5 and if both disable the boost control why does one give +12 and the other +12.5.

Quote:
In Flight however as you said Boost cutout (ABC now not operative) gives you only +12Lbs ... so there is still something limiting you to +12Lbs .. (The mod driilled Bleed holes in the ABC I presume ?).
Exactly, the drilled hole limits boost to +12 even if boost control is disabled.

Quote:
What would happen say at 2000Ft if you simply pushed full throttle past the gate +12.5Lbs or +12Lbs ? Why this diff between +12.5Lbs and +12lbs ... no idea. I need to do some more homework here.

I will delve into the Merlin manuals and the various early Spit maintenance manuals to see if there is anything more specific.
Unfortunately I don't know and so far didn't find anything about it. Pilot's Notes General says the "take-off" boost is not effective above that altitude (I don't think this means above FTH as I would consider FTH as a "considerable altitude"). Note that other engines have the same limitations (e.g. DB601A 1 minute take-power was only allowed below 1-1.5 km).
My only explanation would be that a really rich mixture was used for take-off that wouldn't be possible above that altitude.

Quote:
Of note is the Spit II Merlin XII throttle system is different to the Spit MK I Merlin II/III system

What manual is the last jpg from the one with the line drawings ? This is dealing with a 2 speed supercharger running MS and FS gear (file name implies Merlin XX) , its not relevant to the Merlin XII or II or III as fitted to the Spitfire I and or II.
Yes the Merlin III doesn't have a special take-off power and therefore no gate. The drawing is from "Pilot's Notes Merlin XX" (http://www.flight-manuals.com/merl-xx-pn.html). As can be seen the Merlin XX has a similar system as the Merlin XII and as seen here:
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...s-10june40.jpg
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...xx-15nov40.jpg
the "take-off" boost (by gate) was cleared in June 1940 and "emergency boost" (by cut-out) was cleared in November 1940.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2012, 09:04 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

If I understand you correctly you are discussing the mechanical method of overriding the boost cutout on the Spitfire MkI. (When and where you would use +12lbs boost is going to be a choice of the pilot whether it be takeoff, combat or just extra performance).

Regarding the mechanics, does this help?

The June 1940 Spitfire Pilots Notes state:

Boost Cut_out EMERGENCY control:

36. If it is desired in an emergency to override the automatic boost control, this control can be cut-out by pushing forward the small red-painted lever (17) at the forward end of the throttle quadrant. The lever is sealed against use.


It does not mention a 'gate'. I believe the 'seal' was a thin wire which would be broken when the boost override was operated.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2012, 09:40 AM
Moggy's Avatar
Moggy Moggy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 272
Default

Is that in case the pilot fail to report using the boost klem?
__________________
Keep calm and carry on

http://www.tangmerepilots.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2012, 10:43 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moggy View Post
Is that in case the pilot fail to report using the boost klem?
As a 'tell tale' the ground crew would know it had been used. I'm fairly sure I have read of that being the case but I would have to trawl through about 20 autobiographies

This page
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit1vrs109e.html
refers to 'breaking the wire' but I can't put my hand on definitive data.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-21-2012, 10:56 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Klem the "Gate" it would appear only came in to use with the SPIT II. The Throttle Quadrant on the MKI didn't have a Gate.

Camber thanks for reminding us of that thread and your summary. Great reading.

Last edited by IvanK; 04-21-2012 at 11:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-21-2012, 04:30 PM
Moggy's Avatar
Moggy Moggy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
As a 'tell tale' the ground crew would know it had been used. I'm fairly sure I have read of that being the case but I would have to trawl through about 20 autobiographies

This page
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit1vrs109e.html
refers to 'breaking the wire' but I can't put my hand on definitive data.
No need for that klem, it makes perfect sense what you're saying.
__________________
Keep calm and carry on

http://www.tangmerepilots.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-21-2012, 04:42 PM
JG5_emil's Avatar
JG5_emil JG5_emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 331
Default

Ivan/Banks
"up to the rated altitude this will increase boost (about 12lb./sq.in. at sea level)."

It looks to me that 12 Lb boost is only possible at or close to sea level and that the amount of boost decreases with altitude, which makes sense to me. Is this correct or wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2012, 05:50 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG5_emil View Post
Ivan/Banks
"up to the rated altitude this will increase boost (about 12lb./sq.in. at sea level)."

It looks to me that 12 Lb boost is only possible at or close to sea level and that the amount of boost decreases with altitude, which makes sense to me. Is this correct or wrong?
To quote 'The Spitfire Story' by Alfred Price,

Re 100 octane fuel and boost,

Quote:
Although this gave no improvement at or above the 16,500 foot full throttle height of the merlin II and III engines fitted to spitfires, below that altitude the maximum boost pressure could be raised from 6 1/4 pounds to 12 pounds without causing detonation in the cylinders; the resultant extra power increased the maximum speed by a useful 25 mph at sea level and 34 mph at 10,000 feet.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-21-2012, 05:56 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-21-2012, 06:08 PM
ATAG_Bliss ATAG_Bliss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,156
Default

It'll be interesting to see how the new FMs fly. They can show us all the graphs they want, but I still think it's a little premature to argue over the picture until we've experienced new FMs 1st hand.

Good bit of info though.
__________________

ATAG Forums + Stats
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.