![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I wonder why the "early" limitations give +12 for takeooff and the "later" limitations give +12.5 and if both disable the boost control why does one give +12 and the other +12.5. Quote:
Quote:
My only explanation would be that a really rich mixture was used for take-off that wouldn't be possible above that altitude. Quote:
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...s-10june40.jpg http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...xx-15nov40.jpg the "take-off" boost (by gate) was cleared in June 1940 and "emergency boost" (by cut-out) was cleared in November 1940. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I understand you correctly you are discussing the mechanical method of overriding the boost cutout on the Spitfire MkI. (When and where you would use +12lbs boost is going to be a choice of the pilot whether it be takeoff, combat or just extra performance).
Regarding the mechanics, does this help? The June 1940 Spitfire Pilots Notes state: Boost Cut_out EMERGENCY control: 36. If it is desired in an emergency to override the automatic boost control, this control can be cut-out by pushing forward the small red-painted lever (17) at the forward end of the throttle quadrant. The lever is sealed against use. It does not mention a 'gate'. I believe the 'seal' was a thin wire which would be broken when the boost override was operated.
__________________
klem 56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds" http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/ ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is that in case the pilot fail to report using the boost klem?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As a 'tell tale' the ground crew would know it had been used. I'm fairly sure I have read of that being the case but I would have to trawl through about 20 autobiographies
![]() This page http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit1vrs109e.html refers to 'breaking the wire' but I can't put my hand on definitive data.
__________________
klem 56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds" http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/ ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Klem the "Gate" it would appear only came in to use with the SPIT II. The Throttle Quadrant on the MKI didn't have a Gate.
Camber thanks for reminding us of that thread and your summary. Great reading. Last edited by IvanK; 04-21-2012 at 11:19 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ivan/Banks
"up to the rated altitude this will increase boost (about 12lb./sq.in. at sea level)." It looks to me that 12 Lb boost is only possible at or close to sea level and that the amount of boost decreases with altitude, which makes sense to me. Is this correct or wrong? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Re 100 octane fuel and boost, Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It'll be interesting to see how the new FMs fly. They can show us all the graphs they want, but I still think it's a little premature to argue over the picture until we've experienced new FMs 1st hand.
Good bit of info though. |
![]() |
|
|