King’s Bounty scores 9.5 on CRPG

[natasha]

Originally Posted by Shega

That is not the first 9.5 rating for King's Bounty, you know. And it seems to be quite deserved

mail.ru - 9.5, but users - 8.3
AG - 9.5, but Players - 8.9
Decide, to whom to trust players or authors of reviews!

Cracked by Bill Gilbert
Greatest trouble in «KB» (besides not numerous «bags», straightened by patches) is happiness only on 30-40 hours. In age-old King's Bounty 2 Ïrokof'eva and that HOMM 5 there was the generator of cards, and territory is unchanging here, because hand-made. Yes, at the beginning of party it concernes by casual appearance, that you will meet on the way, but the repeated heat en-route acquainted will not be such enthralling.

Sorre, automatic translation...

[Anatoly]

Actually it is more than 30-40 hours if you take all side quests, etc. Moreover can you name a modern game that boasts at least 30-40 hours of gameplay. I can hardly imagine one, not taking into consideration (add-ons, expansions, mods, map generators, etc.). Talking only about single player.

[Szeszmester]

Originally Posted by natasha

mail.ru - 9.5, but users - 8.3
AG - 9.5, but Players - 8.9
Decide, to whom to trust players or authors of reviews!

Cracked by Bill Gilbert
Greatest trouble in «KB» (besides not numerous «bags», straightened by patches) is happiness only on 30-40 hours. In age-old King's Bounty 2 Ïrokof'eva and that HOMM 5 there was the generator of cards, and territory is unchanging here, because hand-made. Yes, at the beginning of party it concernes by casual appearance, that you will meet on the way, but the repeated heat en-route acquainted will not be such enthralling.

Sorre, automatic translation...

AG rated the game 93%, players rated 89%.
If you check the statistics, u can see that 19 players voted 1% for the game. I think this 19 people are liars! If you don't count their votes, total it gives 91%, it's quite close to AG's original score, and it's above 90%. I trust in this. BTW 30-40 hours is quite a good gameplay value, plus the map is not randomly created but made by a desinger (team).

[natasha]

Originally Posted by Szeszmester

AG rated the game 93%, players rated 89%.
If you check the statistics, u can see that 19 players voted 1% for the game. I think this 19 people are liars! If you don't count their votes, total it gives 91%, it's quite close to AG's original score, and it's above 90%. I trust in this. BTW 30-40 hours is quite a good gameplay value, plus the map is not randomly created but made by a desinger (team).

Everybody draws conclusions, I simply made examples. Certainly a minimum and maximum would need to be deleted. Unreal 10, absurdly 1.
My rating about 8-8.5. 9.5 - only design...
30-40 hours it is needed on the complete passing of game. Someone will play anew, someone it is not...
AG is very good site and review objective enough!