Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

[Al Schlageter]

If by June 1940, 30 squadrons were operating 100 Octane, then almost the entire force would need the +12lbs boost instructions instead of the 87 Octane. The Operating Notes would have reflected this and the 100 Octane limits would have been included.

So your Pilot notes are incomplete. That is, they are missing the Amendments.

Instructions issued 20-3-40.



We have yet to see the identity of these 16 fighter squadrons from you Eugene.

[41Sqn_Banks]

Originally Posted by Al Schlageter

So your Pilot notes are incomplete. That is, they are missing the Amendments.

Not necessarily. Air Publications have a "disclaimer" at the first page. Orders or leaflets are the overriding authority in case they are contradicting to the initial publication or a amendment list. So even if it wouldn't be mentioned in the Pilot's Notes of June 1940 (which it is, see post above), the leaflet from March that authorized the use would have priority.

[Osprey]

12lbs boost, get voting

http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/174

[Al Schlageter]

Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks

Not necessarily. Air Publications have a "disclaimer" at the first page. Orders or leaflets are the overriding authority in case they are contradicting to the initial publication or a amendment list. So even if it wouldn't be mentioned in the Pilot's Notes of June 1940 (which it is, see post above), the leaflet from March that authorized the use would have priority.

Yes that too. He still does not have an complete Pilot Notes.