Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Battle of France as add on?
Yes, will buy this. 55 58.51%
OK, if for free. 21 22.34%
No, looking forward to Eastern front. 18 19.15%
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-02-2012, 12:31 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Nobody is arguing, apart from you. Have a read back in the thread, and check when the thread went OT.

Again were discussing the future of CLOD in the "future of CLOD thread"

thats the last im saying about it Tail.

-------------------------------------------------

Back on topic, Carguy, do you think they will ever add FSAA to CLOD?
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2012, 12:40 PM
taildraggernut taildraggernut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Nobody is arguing, apart from you. Have a read back in the thread, and check when the thread went OT.

Again were discussing the future of CLOD in the "future of CLOD thread"

thats the last im saying about it Tail.

-------------------------------------------------

Back on topic, Carguy, do you think they will ever add FSAA to CLOD?
I did read it and it went OT at post 2 which coincidentally was yours, I'm not arguing, I made an appeal to what I assumed were in reality reasonable people to perhaps tone down the point scoring style posts, I ended up in an exchange with you because you replied, like I said I have been reading these forums for ages and I will have to say you do seem to feature heavily in alot of the more heated discussions.

I thought COD already has AA (just not working well, expecting the patch to fix it) or is AA different to FSAA?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-2012, 09:01 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Claptrap taildragger...you went looking for an argument with me to make your mark. Dont absolve yourself or put yourself on a higher plane just yet....

If you're going to wade in, at least have the cajones to stick with it.

This place should be a sepulchre, given the amount of holier-than-thou always on offer.

One minute in the thick of it, the next looking skyward and whistling innocence. Ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-02-2012, 09:05 PM
taildraggernut taildraggernut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
Claptrap taildragger...you went looking for an argument with me to make your mark. Dont absolve yourself or put yourself on a higher plane just yet....

If you're going to wade in, at least have the cajones to stick with it.

This place should be a sepulchre, given the amount of holier-than-thou always on offer.

One minute in the thick of it, the next looking skyward and whistling innocence. Ridiculous.
You might do well to take your own advice, I seem to recall you telling me I have no business entering a conversation uninvited, just because you can swan on in here with 'oh so beautifully crafted' sentences doesn't give you any absolution either.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-02-2012, 09:48 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The difference being I dont claim any.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-02-2012, 10:10 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

If you think you are going to turn every thread into a he said / she said argument you are wrong so better stop now...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-02-2012, 10:40 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

'Every'? You mean two recently as far as I can recall, and I'm pretty much done in this one. I prefer to criticise the game than the posters, but sometimes it seems you have to get throughh one to get to the other.

And it depends on the provocation on offer.

You may prefer not to risk it and have one less pesky critic to deal with by a simple banning. Satisfaction all round.

*Edit* that reads a bit more petulantly than intended...I mean I dont intend to change my ways, and you may find it easier to ban me now than later. It saves me asking to be banned and it taking a while.

If you can be bothered, you might also wade through some of the preliminaries just to see where I was coming from. Okay, fair enough, not sure I could bothered either.

The baiters and high-horses *do* need sorting out. Not many seem willing to try.

Last edited by Falstaff; 04-02-2012 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.