|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
03-22-2012, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
UBI the western publisher has very little control of anything to do with COD or its sequels. The IC Company and Russian publisher is the main financer and controller of the IC Maddox Games development.
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8 Asus PT6 Motherboard 6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600 Asus GTX580 Direct CU II 60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it 500gig HD Dual Boot Samsung 32"LG 120hz MSFF2 Joystick Cougar Throttle Saitek Pro Rudder pedals Voice Activation Controls Track IR 5 ProClip 
|
|
#2
03-22-2012, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
03-22-2012, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wow.. the silence is stunning
They're not hard questions,, are they?
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4 Stand alone Collector's Edition DCS Series Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound.
|
|
#4
03-22-2012, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Do you know the answer? Is it written somewhere? Anyway you don't release a product in that condition. Because this is business, not "art". Imo the current developers are not totally guilty. I think it's a management's issue, having similar issues myself in the past. Instead if you look at the lack of communication then IMO it's both 1C's and ubi's objective fault. Just wait the day guys will start complaining directly to the publishers... that can be the end for CloD. But we're not so bad and we limit the complaining to this message board.
__________________
 A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-22-2012 at 07:24 PM.
|
|
#5
03-22-2012, 08:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Example: http://blog.bioware.com/2012/03/21/4108/ To date I think the guys have been doing the best with what they've got. It's a small team developing an extremely complex piece of software, compare that to the FPS genre where you have a huge dev team working on mainly eye-candy. Last edited by Codex; 03-22-2012 at 08:26 PM.
|
|
#6
03-22-2012, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
03-23-2012, 12:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm scared about it.
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
|
|
#8
03-23-2012, 01:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well... very soon i'll not be "divided" anymore, i'll go back to fly choppers:
http://www.arma3.com/full/wp-content...ot_1105_14.jpg I believe the "graphics engine" of ArmA 3 will have at least FXAA at the release and a little less stuttering... Bye!
|
|
#9
03-22-2012, 11:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
SO.... UBI named the sim Cliffs of Dover, much to the upset of Maddox Games and the sim (western version) was force released by UBI. The original title for the sim was; "Storm of War: the Battle of Brittain". You (et al) keep on complaining about lack of communication... fair enough - why should they, when greeted with hostility. You (at al) keep on banging on about business and "management issue"... well good again. Who creates the sim and who publishes the sim? and further good for you (et al) for just limiting the whining to this board... though, is it getting you (et al) anywhere?
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4 Stand alone Collector's Edition DCS Series Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound. Last edited by Wolf_Rider; 03-22-2012 at 11:41 PM.
|
|
#10
03-23-2012, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And where did you read about that forced release? Quote:
 The publisher needs to be aware of the state of the product, because of a matter of his professional image. Ubisoft did a hole in the water with SH5 too, and infact look at their image: it's an hated publisher and many customers avoid their games (not only since the release of CloD and SH5). I found it strange that people kept asking at them about the game and they didn't know anything... About the whining and complaining: I'm totally for it, both as customer and developer. Constructive whining is needed to improve the product (no one is perfect). I remember some days after the release there were guys loving the sound of the engines (the old IL2's one)... why should they improve the sound engine then? Why should they avoid the "engine radar" if nobody is complaining about it (and I did a lot: it was one of my battle horses  )We don't know if they are reading the message board... if they read then they could at least acknowledge the requests/complains. If not then keep whining to so that the problem stays alive and it's not forgotten. Whining does not kill anyone and there is always the "ignore" function that so few are actually using. Of course sometimes I end with feeding the trolls like today... but I've had some fun: if they are not banned than lets exploit them.  This is one thing I don't understand: attack the offensive posters, report them, its' ok... but let the people complain if they want, just ignore them. IMO whining about the whiners is really damaging the forum... Live and let live.
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-23-2012 at 01:50 AM.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
