Why was TreeUK banned?

[Vittuuntunut]

Originally Posted by Sutts

Constructive criticism is fine. But endless bitching about the same issues we know about, the devs know about and are working hard to fix achieves nothing and should not be tolerated. Simple really.

True that, but I think that the recent announcement of the sequel along with "tank-addon" and what not has somewhat undermined the credibility of the "devs know the burning problems & are working hard to fix them" -argument.

There seems to be even less and less reasons to avoid the thought of being cheated by the developer.

But all of this is off-topic and stated milloin times. It´s still true though...

[Sutts]

Originally Posted by Vittuuntunut

True that, but I think that the recent announcement of the sequel along with "tank-addon" and what not has somewhat undermined the credibility of the "devs know the burning problems & are working hard to fix them" -argument.

There seems to be even less and less reasons to avoid the thought of being cheated by the developer.

But all of this is off-topic and stated milloin times. It´s still true though...

Blacksix explained that posting the sequel material was his idea - an attempt to fill the void until more patch info became available. He recognises now that it was a mistake. Personally, I accept that his intentions were well meaning and can understand that he'd like to keep a low profile now until the patch is out.

I have no problems at all with the devs working on the sequel in parallel. It has been stated many times that it shares the same engine as CloD and anything they do to improve the engine will filter down to the product we already own. Good things will come, just need a little more patience.

[raaaid]

Yeah i think I went off for a couple of months when I came back people would be so sick of the same topics that everybody would apreciate my fresh originality