Friday Update, February 24, 2012

Originally Posted by Dano

It's hardly a trick, they need to widen the audience and it's one way of doing so.

I think that there are better ideas, in order of importance.

1. fix the core game engine and bugs (in progress)
2. fix co-op (in progress?)
3. Add additional content (no mention)
4. Add additional aircraft, campaigns, etc.
.
.
.
.
.
53. Add tanks.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by speculum jockey

I think that there are better ideas, in order of importance.

1. fix the core game engine and bugs (in progress)
2. fix co-op (in progress?)
3. Add additional content (no mention)
4. Add additional aircraft, campaigns, etc.
5. go out of business due to lack of funds
.
.
.
.
.
53. Add tanks.

Fixxed that for ya

[Force10]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Fixxed that for ya

#5 would not apply if #1 was done in a timely fashion.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by Force10

#5 would not apply if #1 was done in a timely fashion.

if..

And 'if' monkies flew out of my butt waring red hats and holding ray-guns I could rule the world

[BH_woodstock]

im keeping my fingers crossed and hoping all this works out.

[furbs]

If anyone thinks that these vehicles and tanks are going to get more people to buy BOM the flight sim, then they need their head looking at.

This is a complete waste of time and energy. its not going to attract anyone who is not already interested in BOM.

The IL2 series is heading in the wrong direction.

Where is the info on whats in the patch? You know the patch for CLOD?

Has the patch fixed the CTD?

Has the AI improved so single player isn't a waste of time?

Has the patch fixed the FM problems?

When do we get the missing features?

Just a tip...

Sack the guys making tanks and jeeps and hire coders who can fix COOPS, fix SLI, make new clouds and fix the FMs.

Anyway...thanks for the update.

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Fixxed that for ya

It's amazing how Battlefield 3 can stay in business without having to include any resource mining like in Minecraft.

Strange how Starcraft 2 can make a mint, without having to include a racing element to it.

How FSX can make a ton of money over the past decade without having to include a First person shooter portion to it.

So why does CLOD have to include Tanks to survive? It could be cool, but maybe once they actually finish the game. And I'm not even talking about bugs, but actually finish the game so one would classify it as a finished product. Right now the thing is closer to a Beta content wise.

Originally Posted by Dano

Did I say it was a good idea?

Didn't say that you did or didn't. Just explaining my point of view, while using your post as a frame of reference for the topic.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by speculum jockey

but maybe once they actually finish the game. And I'm not even talking about bugs, but actually finish the game so one would classify it as a finished product.

Well based on 1C's track record CoD will never be finished..

Sequals will come out that add content and update features and fix bugs..

Thus never really finished

Which is a good thing imho

[SEE]

With some of the largest tank battles (with air support) occuring on the Eastern Front, having the option to be in the air or on the ground could make for a very diverse gaming experience. I remain ever optomistic, thanks BS.

[addman]

Originally Posted by SEE

With some of the largest tank battles (with air support) occuring on the Eastern Front, having the option to be in the air or on the ground could make for a very diverse gaming experience. I remain ever optomistic, thanks BS.

The thought makes me fuzzy all over. Imagine a combined air/ground assault on a town/airfield coordinated over TS3, just awesome! What a difference it will make when you're flying cover for a group of tanks that are manned by players instead of A.I.