Why no E4s

[jojovtx]

Originally Posted by Osprey

If that's the case then why complain?

Because I like the simplicity of the auto prop and the m-geshoss. Has no impact on aircraft FM. Simply put.

The spit2a is pulled because of ahistorical FM matchup due to 1C fudging this game up. So it gets pulled. Fine and please bring it back as soon as 1C get's the FM stuff right. The E4 get's pulled because......the spit2a got pulled?

How does that make sense. The E4 flies within the same FM envelope as all other 109 FM. So if the e4 get's pulled because the spit2a get's pulled but this is all about FM comparion then where is the correlation? Thus the spit2a vs 109e4 argument is moot as the debate then becomes apple vs orange instead of apple vs apple.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by jojovtx

Because I like the simplicity of the auto prop and the m-geshoss. Has no impact on aircraft FM. Simply put.

The spit2a is pulled because of ahistorical FM matchup due to 1C fudging this game up. So it gets pulled. Fine and please bring it back as soon as 1C get's the FM stuff right. The E4 get's pulled because......the spit2a got pulled?

No, you said it's the same as all of the others, so I suggested you fly something else if that is the case. The point is that your logic was flawed, because the E4 actually has an advantage that you want otherwise you'd fly something else.

Just get on with it.

As for Doggles, well you've got it all worked out in your own head haven't you......

[VO101_Tom]

Originally Posted by Osprey

If that's the case then why complain?

Exactly that's why. Why should you pick out the E-4 with the SpitIIa together? FM and Handling? The FM same as other 109, the handling same simple as the RAF planes. The real reason is the armament, but it's so pathetic, that have to lie something different.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by VO101_Tom

Exactly that's why. Why should you pick out the E-4 with the SpitIIa together? FM and Handling? The FM same as other 109, the handling same simple as the RAF planes. The real reason is the armament, but it's so pathetic, that have to lie something different.

I know why, just picking holes in his argument.

Soon these guys are going to get hammered by upgraded Spitfires and get found out that they aren't the ace's they thought they were. My advice is "disengage, choose the right fight, don't play his game, be the condescending ace that I am, blah blah yadda yadda"

[Richie]

Originally Posted by VO101_Tom

Exactly that's why. Why should you pick out the E-4 with the SpitIIa together? FM and Handling? The FM same as other 109, the handling same simple as the RAF planes. The real reason is the armament, but it's so pathetic, that have to lie something different.

You can see the difference in the sizes at 4:50 in the armament.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AWoj...4&feature=plcp