![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bad example
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8 Asus PT6 Motherboard 6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600 Asus GTX580 Direct CU II 60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it 500gig HD Dual Boot Samsung 32"LG 120hz MSFF2 Joystick Cougar Throttle Saitek Pro Rudder pedals Voice Activation Controls Track IR 5 ProClip |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I DO understand the frustration. Though I agree with Ace's comments regarding the purchase of hardware, I also see there's more to it than that. I've witnessed the same names here as I have at UBI for ten years now. We've all waited for this game for quite a while. CoD being put on the shelves in the state it is IS disappointing. I get that. To be fair the arguing goes both ways. There's been immaturity on both sides. Niether side has been immune to it. I'm sure I've been part of it. Obviously it hasn't solved anything. At what point do we pick up the placcards and end the protesting of the theatre? It's been almost ten months. Heck, some have worn the placcard of discontent for almost five years. This going back and forth makes what should be a great forum with intelligent, knowlegable people into a place that's no longer an enjoyment. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
With regards to the 'degree' of complaining If the film broke 1/3rd of the way into the movie, On my way out of the theater I would more than likely ask for my money back.. But.. When doing so I would NOT portray the situation as dire! That is to say I would NOT portray myself as some sort of victim who will now have to choose between feeding my children tonight or paying to see another movie should the theater choose not to give me my money back Why? Because anyone would see that for what it is.. An disingenuous hyping of the situation Now with regards to another analogy someone else provided If my new car died 1/3 of a mile after leaving the dealership.. Than there is a good chance my kids would be eating top roman for a few weeks should the car dealer choose not to give me my money back.. And thus I would not be hyping the situation when I walk back to the car dealership and 'made a sceen' about it See the difference? If so than you can see why some like Hood who say the 'cost of something is irrelevant' is a silly argument Granted the amount of disposable income is realitive That is to say there is a chance that for some out there the cost of the $50 game to them equates to the cost of a 40,000 car to others But if that was true, and the chance of you living on the street tonight depended on the outcome of a $50 game you bought this year.. Chances are you don't have a $2500 PC to play this or any other game on in the first place. So again, a silly argument to say cost is irrelevant IMHO. Put another way, some will pick up a quarter if they drop it, some wont pick up a penny if they drop it Cost is relevant Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 02-14-2012 at 06:14 PM. |
![]() |
|
|