![]() |
|
Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regarding Graphics Cards I would like to add:
Even the highest DX10 card of 2011 is hardly sufficient to play the game at the highest settings. So, be prepared to live with compromises waiting for the next or the after next generation of GPUs... SLI (and I suppose Crossfire as well) does not really work (so do not hope that a second GPU will give you the performance you are missing with your 2011 or older GPU). As far SLI is concerned, the game officialy (JAN2012) does not support it, you can make SLI work but the performance (on my GTX570 1.3Gb VRAM) has more fps but more stutter so I can not recommend sli to anyone. According to some people who tested it with their 3Gb graphics cards, the game requires 2,4Gb VRAM with the highest settings. Therefore what you need is a card with at least 2,5Gb VRAM if you want to see all "eye candy". Again, you may still be dissapointed with the performance but at least, VRAM will not be the factor that destroys your experience. In worst case, go for a card with min 2Gb if you want to buy a card with the least money now. The new generation of ATI cards is out now. I have no experience about it so it is good to keep your eays and ears open for reviews on this card and hopefully we will have CoD users soon to share their impressions with us! ~S~ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regarding Video cards and VRam size. A lot of what 335th_GRAthos said is corrent, but it also depends on the number of monitors you're playing on and the resolution. If you're on a typical 20" monitor, playing at 1600x900 or somewhere around that area, you're probably going to be fine with a 2GB card for all the eye candy. Going to higher resolution with everything maxed is when you start getting into the 2.4GB VRAM requirement he mentioned.
When going for the 2GB+ cards, be mindful if they are single or dual GPU cards. A dual GPU card is pretty much an SLI/XFire setup that's confined to one card, so don't expect amazing gains. Believe it or not, the biggest limiting factor isn't hardware, but software. The game was released in what could be called a "broken state" so it's requiring more system resources and horsepower than it really should need. If you can, wait for the new Graphics engine to be released and see what happens after that. Maybe it will be the 20-50% FPS increase that Luthier was saying, but it might also be another flop. Remember those guys who bought cutting edge systems for $2000 during the summer of 2010? Well they're getting their systems spanked by people with $800 PC's now, and they're lucky to have their games playing at anything higher than medium across the board. HOLD ON TO YOUR MONEY! You're waited damn near a year for this game to be playable, just wait another month or two! The best thing that can happen is component prices drop, you save money, and getting a better system than if you bought now. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Performance of an ATi Radeon HD7970 over a GTX580 in a Nutshell:
In average 10% more FPS. Not many FPS in Starcraft 2 or GTAIV, but 25%-33% more FPS in Serious Sam BFE and Crysis 2 with SSAA. Increased Tesselationperformance. Powerdraw: 185Watts under power, 12Watts idling. Fan: idle 0.7 Sone, power 4.1 Sone (AMD Fandesign, Custom ones can and will be more Silent) http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,86...fikkarte/Test/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The advice I'm giving is to keep people from wasting money. If they only play Cliffs of Dover, then waiting until the graphics engine patch comes out is the best thing they can do. That way they can see if they need to spend a lot, or a little to get their ideal FPS. Heck, maybe their system only needs a slight upgrade because the new Graphics engine is so good. Maybe they decided trying to get a constant 60+ is not worth it because the new graphics engine only give a 5% boost in FPS. The decision to "pull the trigger" is ultimately up to them, but financially speaking, waiting makes sense. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alot of people go with the Intell chipsets i5 i7 $1,000 etc Many years ago I knew nothing about computers I had a Dell optiplex P4 windows xp 2 gig nvidia 9800gt Great for wolfeinstein online and a few other 2006 games
From then till now i been upgrading and learning how to speed up and better my computer other then adding parts. Defrag Ping fps processes firewall anti virse Overclocking The list go's on I pay for 12 mbps i get 21Mbps download on a good day 19 Avg I could pay for more but It works for me and what i do I now run a Amd duel core II x2 215 Unlocked to 240. 8 gigs of ram duel channel DDR3 Kingston Overclockable Lsp 750watt Psu 80 gold rated Asus Crosshair formula V Motherboard ATX up to 32gigs 3 way SLI or crossfire OC button Rog connect 5770 XFX DDR5 1 gig Video card SSD master 1TB Slave Windows 7 Home 47" LG LCD Tv for a screen Now i know i'm lacking in some places ( Duel core and video ) However Money is tight I have a mortgage of $480,000 cars wife etc My computer isn't my number issue But part of my hobby in my man cave It runs CLOD just fine with teamspeak and Fraps running in the back ground and high settings with no jitters or frezze AMD is half the cost of intell and many run par or "just" under My biggest issue was i came into cliffs thinking it was a start and go game like fighter ace Were the most you had to do was learn about flaps and rudder and not warm up, air screws , prop pitch, ..at least have a online combat room were new people learn at there own pace .. Since April 2011 till now i been in the rooms 3 times ...Got to start and blow the engine 1 time..Anyone that tells me ..well its a combat sim then i tell you this where is the rain and fog for london? Seach lights at night heavy flak fire storms after a raid Anyways Well at anyrate i'll still think they will see this and open the game to more of the "Game" customers or a option for new gamers to play with the sim pros ..new meat sorta speaking cheers |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went with a Evga 580gtx with 3 gigs of Vram. It was not cheap, but I do
play other sims/games, and I think the game runs very well with this card. I'm still adjusting various settings, to see what runs the best for me. I just wanted to have lots of ram, and the new nvidia Kepler cards may not be out for a while. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well said speculum, there is no need to go crazy.... $615 and your playing the game
![]() AMD FX-4100 Zambezi 3.6GHz $110 GIGABYTE GA-990XA-UD3 AM3+ motherboard $130 G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 8GB $50 6850 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 $135 CORSAIR Professional Series HX750 $120 SSD 30GB $50 ASUS 24X DVD Burner $20 TOTAL $615 smile
__________________
Gigabyte Z68 Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler 8GB Ram EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W 64 GB SSD SATA II HD WIN7 UL 64BIT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen a few people trying to push the i7 recently, and I'll restate this again.
The i7 DOES NOT help you get better performance in any game. NO GAMES USE HYPERTHREADING in a manner that garners any sort of visible FPS increase. Most gamers actually suggest that you disable hyperthreading in the BIOS so it doesn't slow down your gaming. Oh, it's $100 more than the i5 as well. Here are some questions you should ask yourself: Do I run a Fortune 500 database on my Gaming Rig? Am I currently running simulations for medical research? Am I currently farming my PC out for generic number crunching research? Do I spend hours a day encoding/decoding audio or video? Am I spending hours a day using the newest version of Photoshop to edit Gigapixel photos? Notice how I said "hours" for those last two? That's because you would have to spend hours, multiple hours using those programs before you even saved a minute by using hyperthreading. Before you drop an additional $100 on an i7 processor, you need to know that it will make ZERO difference in your Cliffs of Dover gaming. That money would be better put towards a $100 more expensive video card, or maybe a $50 more expensive video card and 2-4GB more RAM so you can create a RAM drive to help combat stuttering. |
![]() |
|
|