Thoughts ?

[KG26_Alpha]

What's he balancing ?

I was more listening to the people in the clip who took part in BoB and flew.

Not the presenter.

[5./JG27.Farber]

Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch

Particularly if it's James Holland's idea of 'balancing', for sure.

+1 with all my heart!


Anyway back to black pudding, its delicous!
I believe its a true testament to the worship of Swine to not only consume their flesh but blood. Its only right we use the whole animal!

[ATAG_Dutch]

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

Anyone back to black pudding, its delicous!

Fried or boiled? Poll! Poll!

[bongodriver]

Fried of course, boiling is for peasants

[KG26_Alpha]

Deep fried in lard not oil

And back to the clip

Balancing.............






.

[bongodriver]

Butter......


oh erm....yes balancing ahem..

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

But apparently it was not a 'battle', it's now a well established concept that the british were innept monkeys who wasted all their time waving union jacks and trying to figure out where the keyhole was for the clockwork winding mechanism on the merlin, meanwhile the glorious Luftwaffe were sunning their aryan bodies and berbequeing Bratwurst on the Normandy beaches as a wind down for their European tour, everyone knows the German bombers were dropping candy and flowers but the evil British empire were dedicated to prevent the spread of peace and love.

rotfl

[Sternjaeger II]

Originally Posted by ElAurens

I'm not talking tactics here.

Tacitics are for n00bs in any discussion of campaigns.

The RAF was better organised as an air force, they were better led, and had better logistical support, and as we all know, logistics wins wars, not single engagement tactics.

are you sure about this?
Germany learned a lot about organisation and operating abroad thanks to the Spanish Civil War, Great Britain was fighting on its own soil, and that's a HUGE advantage. I can agree about the fact that the Luftwaffe had a worse leadership, but to saying it was less organised is ridiculous. Once again, let's not forget they were operating from a foreign country, with all the possible logistics strains, and still managed to bring Great Britain to the brink of collapse with their bombing campaign.
They didn't manage to overcome their opponents just because they were led by a buffoon and dispersed their offensive potential, but had all the capability to gain air superiority all the time.

[ATAG_Dutch]

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

but saying it was less organised is ridiculous. they still managed to bring Great Britain to the brink of collapse with their bombing campaign.

.......Nope. I'm not going to bother.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=26290

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

are you sure about this?
Germany learned a lot about organisation and operating abroad thanks to the Spanish Civil War, Great Britain was fighting on its own soil, and that's a HUGE advantage. I can agree about the fact that the Luftwaffe had a worse leadership, but to saying it was less organised is ridiculous. Once again, let's not forget they were operating from a foreign country, with all the possible logistics strains, and still managed to bring Great Britain to the brink of collapse with their bombing campaign.
They didn't manage to overcome their opponents just because they were led by a buffoon and dispersed their offensive potential, but had all the capability to gain air superiority all the time.

in a way Germany was also fighting on it's own soil, it had after all just conquered France and was using coastal airfields and local resources with an uninterupted supply line from the the Fatherland.