![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
All the published performance data is TAS. So when comparing Sim test performance to published data use TAS as well. Wonder woman view gives TAS.
Also there is always an issue with Atmosphere so do your tests Crimea Midday. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sawyer. What supercharger settings (3) were you using in your 20,000ft test ? and on what map.
a 60KIAS diff is huge. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I do appreciate your "ear" on this and your responses. (I also pondered the TAS vs IAS but the comparison shows air is air) Last edited by sawyer692; 01-14-2012 at 07:01 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Likewise
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sawyer your 20,000Ft figures for 4.11 are way off. in your post 120 You got these numbers:
20,000ft 4.101 – 222kias 4.11 - 160kias i.e. a diff of 62KIAS I re tested in both 4.10.1 and 4.11. F4U1C, 100% Fuel, Rad 2, 100% Power Prop pitch 100%, Supercharger 3 Default, Crimea Midday I get 220KIAS or 579KMH TAS in 4.10.1 I get 210KIAS or 566KMH TAS in 4.11 A diff of 10KIAS or 12KMH TAS Wonder Woman view cockpits off with the gaudy circular instruments |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'll get together with my squad and do some more testing and research in the next couple days. Again, I appreciate your time on this matter. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am referring to this document from some of the 1943 official performance tests: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...4u-1-02334.pdf Not sure what you mean by "Wonder woman view" unless you are referring to the hud. I fly mostly full real anyhow but for our tests I will use the hud for reference. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Try everything at Sea level Crimea. See what numbers you get then compare them to a specific chart from your reference. Also read the title of that report .. it refers to a test for max performance at War Emergency Power of a "Cleaned up version" ![]() When I test in 4.11 Again Crimea Midday, WEP, RAD 2, 100% Fuel at 19,000ft (FTH Supercharger 3) I get the following: 240KIAS,280MPH IAS, 633KMH TAS (that works out at 393MPH TAS or 342Knots TAS) The Max speed achieved in the Cleaned up test aircraft was as the report shows 429MPH TAS (averaged of the 2 runs). Its also worth pointing out they flew the test at 23,000ft, rather than the 19,000ft I flew the test. Last edited by IvanK; 01-14-2012 at 07:36 AM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perhaps it would be helpful if you would share the performance data you used to model the aircraft as well. I'm doing the best I can here by researching and citing my references but I feel that I am simply hitting a brick wall. I'm sure your data is more relevant and official and I would like to see it as well if you don't mind?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, if you look at the date of the document these tests were conducted on the earlier model F4U-1 in 1943. After which the aerodynamic and performance improvements were made and then the C and D models were developed. Take a look at this doc from the US Navy Bureau of Aeronautics dated 1945 on the test results of the F4U-1C and 1D models, FULLY LOADED (defined in the doc), which we also use in the sim:
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...f4u-1d-acp.pdf Last edited by h0MbrE; 01-14-2012 at 08:03 AM. |
![]() |
|
|