Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2011, 12:47 AM
Frequent_Flyer's Avatar
Frequent_Flyer Frequent_Flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, IL-US
Posts: 166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ploughman View Post
I think you're missing some of the plus points of the Battle of Moscow.

1. It's of central interest to 1Cs core customer base; the Russian market, meaning more people will invest in the game and keep the thing going.

2. By this emphasis on the core market Luthier is commiting himself to meeting the technical needs of the sim's core base which tends to have less capable machines to run this sim on than those of us in the west.
It is a known fact that the Russian Market is 1C's largest market segment? My educated guess would have been North America, assuming CLOD had the same demographics as IL-2.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2011, 02:10 AM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer View Post
It is a known fact that the Russian Market is 1C's largest market segment? My educated guess would have been North America, assuming CLOD had the same demographics as IL-2.
Educated guess on what basis? gut feeling? If North America was 1C's largest market then how is it that throughout IL2's life North America has always been last to see a release?
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2011, 03:08 AM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer View Post
It is a known fact that the Russian Market is 1C's largest market segment? My educated guess would have been North America, assuming CLOD had the same demographics as IL-2.
The Russian market is huge, considering the number of players. But the game 3-5 times more expensive in EU/US. So, I do not think that any of the market would be more important than the other, if you look at the business aspects.

I think it really matter that the Russian community is much more hostile than we are (it said Luthier), then he will choose a theme, which is closer to them. But not just them, i prefer the BoM too. I really look forward instead of bleak desert maps with LW, RAI, RAF types... again... little bored...
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2011, 04:12 AM
BigC208 BigC208 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
I really look forward instead of bleak desert maps with LW, RAI, RAF types... again... little bored...
I'm with you on this one. With the amount of detailed ground vehicles and objects BoM is going to be a bonanza for ground pounding. Even the older Russian aircraft could be dangerous to ground troops. Be fun protecting either side's ground troops. Even more fun hedge hopping and strafing collumns of infantry and support vehicles in a Rata with 20mm canon and rockets.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2011, 05:20 AM
tarks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reality is , as long as they release a SDK where you can make new maps with new textures , even islands - we wont really need expansions apart from new aircraft. The mod community can do it all and probably better as can be seen in most games.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:09 AM
tintifaxl tintifaxl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigC208 View Post
I'm with you on this one. With the amount of detailed ground vehicles and objects BoM is going to be a bonanza for ground pounding. Even the older Russian aircraft could be dangerous to ground troops. Be fun protecting either side's ground troops. Even more fun hedge hopping and strafing collumns of infantry and support vehicles in a Rata with 20mm canon and rockets.
I fear we will not see any grunts in BoM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:17 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigC208 View Post
I'm with you on this one. With the amount of detailed ground vehicles and objects BoM is going to be a bonanza for ground pounding. Even the older Russian aircraft could be dangerous to ground troops. Be fun protecting either side's ground troops. Even more fun hedge hopping and strafing collumns of infantry and support vehicles in a Rata with 20mm canon and rockets.
90% of the I-16 (and all of the I-153) were ShKAS-armed versions. In 1941 the ShVAK-armed types were as rare as a win in the lottery and only from 1942 on I-16 were modified with heavier armament by the frontline units.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2011, 04:03 PM
Frequent_Flyer's Avatar
Frequent_Flyer Frequent_Flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, IL-US
Posts: 166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
The Russian market is huge, considering the number of players. But the game 3-5 times more expensive in EU/US. So, I do not think that any of the market would be more important than the other, if you look at the business aspects.

I think it really matter that the Russian community is much more hostile than we are (it said Luthier), then he will choose a theme, which is closer to them. But not just them, i prefer the BoM too. I really look forward instead of bleak desert maps with LW, RAI, RAF types... again... little bored...
Although, geographically speaking the approach to Moscow is nothing exciting to look at. Historically speaking the battle took place from October 1941 thru January 1942. Much of the landscape will be snow covered for a large percentage of the conflict, very similar to desert landscape.
If we get the" dynamic weather" feature this would add some interest to both a BOM and the Med.
I am not certain why BOM was choosen next, but my guess would be it requires less development then the PTO or Med. Refering to a simple map with no shipping and the requsite Naval and supply vessels. It would be much more interesting to me to have the antishiiping missions with the Italian and LW aircraft. The ground engagments in the Med were also significant, but would require additional British and US vehicles,along with Italian, US, RAF aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2011, 06:39 PM
xpzorg xpzorg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 75
Default

Quite amusing to read the opinion of western consumers about what should be next.
I am russian consumer and I know pretty little about med conflict, it's not really interesting for me. In sukhoi all happy about choose conflict for sequel.
I just wish you to wait interesting for you conflict.

Last edited by xpzorg; 12-29-2011 at 06:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-29-2011, 06:49 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alright chaps, just returned from a rather lenghty ban for 'not learning my lesson', probably deserved, although I cant see it listed in the forum rules anywhere!! So whats been happening, should I learn my lesson and put all my trust back into Luthier and this game or is it the same old dissappointments and waiting for patches/news?

Oh and Merry Christmas one and all
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.