![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And a view that is baseless.. By baseless I mean the only way a person can view it as doom'n'gloom is to totally ignore 1C's track record with IL-2. Where IL-2 was supported for 10+ years! 1) Where IL-2 recived dozens of free updates that not only fixxed bugs but added new features, aircraft, maps, etc. 2) Where IL-2 recived several payfor sequal updates that not only fixxed bugs but included all the privious features, aircraft, maps, etc while at the same time adding featrues, aircraft, maps, etc It's too bad that these doom'n'gloom folks are either too young, or too forgetfull, or just not around to have experanced how 1C handled IL-2, because had they would not be so worried/upset by the news that 1C is working on a sequel
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
|