![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At this point the most carried sidearm used by German forces was the Walther P38. A far superior weapon than the complex, expensive to manufacture, and relatively malfunction prone P-06, what most people commonly call a "Luger". Both chambered in 9 X 19 Parabellum, or more simply called 9mm Luger.
If an RAF pilot carried a sidearm it would have been the Enfield No.2 Mk I, or the No.2 Mk.I*, chambered in what the British called 380/200 (.380" diameter bullet that weighed 200 grains), and what Americans call .38 Smith & Wesson. (Note: this is not the more modern 38 Special caliber, that is actually .357" in diameter).
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The smaller the side arm was the more likely it was used as a side arm for flying personell. Those side arms with German Waffenamts Markings today are desired collectors items. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the info! I can understand why they would prefer the smaller pistols, by and large chambered in 32 ACP (7.65 Browning), over the large P38 or even the Luger. And it's really sort of a morale booster anyway, as we all know, a handgun will loose almost every time to a man with a rifle.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
the Norvegian Kongsberg M1914 (license built Colt M1911) in the Wehrmacht known as: Pistole 657 (n) (Picture shows Post war produced Model circa 1946-1947) ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have no idea if this is historically correct, but a rather impressive film anyhow:
The German (Sidearms do play an important role here.) Last edited by Artist; 12-11-2011 at 07:08 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And a Messerschmitt BF 109 dogfighting over Ireland? I higly doubt that! They could barely reach London and then had to take an sharp eye on their fuel gauge, as they didnt had the 300 liter externals during the BoB. IMHO it would be more historical correct with an Spitfire fighting an long range recce plane and not a BF 109. ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes it was chambered in .45 ACP.
|
![]() |
|
|