![]() |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Indeed, however, what difference that makes to my question relating to your attitude I don't know.
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1 |
#82
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Everybody take a deep breath and get back on topic please.
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back OT :
I don't understand why we shld hve a Su-26 in a WWII sim. I know that providing a way for having nice vids on Youtube is a way to secure sells but wouldn't it be more appropriate to see TigerMoth airshow or something like the Bu-131 modelised ? C'mon a bright and shiny yellow Bucker will do the trick aswel. Just hve a look of what Udet did with s fairly basic (only slightly modified) Flamingo |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look, if I was the project manager of CloD the Su26 would be part of the game as a "bonus" since the beta release.
Simply because I would have use it as the reference plane to test the sim engines: we have fresh data and living pilots' accounts on his attitudes. Test it, tweak the engines until that model flies like the real one does. The DM and all the related parts could wait. First it need to be a flight sim, then a combat sim. Once the Su26 act like the real one start working on one or two WW2 planes... and not more until they are not perfect: if this was a great sim I would buy it also if with only 2 planes flyable (spit and 109?)
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd rather have a Jungmann than a Su26, but then again a Su26 would be good as Manu said to push the FM envelope and see where the we are at with it and what can be still improved.
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
Maybe the FM is not that high fidelity that we have been led to believe thus no high performance Su-26 showing all the glaring errors right away... |
![]() |
|
|