Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads
Reload this Page radiators have no influence on speed
Register FAQ Calendar

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:24 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
as cheesehawk says!

ace is suggest you to buy glasses
No need to by glasses.. In that I allready pointed out that the graph is supsect wrt the number, which is why I posted the number

What is more important to point out here is

The total lack of any data you provided to support your claim!!

That is the real joke here, how you condem 1C based on nothing what so ever!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:29 PM
David198502's Avatar
David198502 David198502 is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,536
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
No need to by glasses.. In that I allready pointed out that the graph is supsect wrt the number, which is why I posted the number

What is more important to point out here is

The total lack of any data you provided to support your claim!!

That is the real joke here, how you condem 1C based on nothing what so ever!
well now you gave me the document to prove my claim...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:31 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
well now you gave me the document to prove my claim...
Clearly you don't understand what 'proof' means

But I am not suprised, in that your not the first to come here with nothing and make a baseless claim.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:35 PM
David198502's Avatar
David198502 David198502 is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,536
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Clearly you don't understand what 'proof' means

But I am not suprised, in that your not the first to come here with nothing and make a baseless claim.
well my base of the claim is the game...now you brought up the doc to proof me wrong, but in the end, it supports my "baseless" claim.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:40 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
well my base of the claim is the game...now you brought up the doc to proof me wrong, but in the end, it supports my "baseless" claim.
You know what is even funnier?

In your last few posts you act as if you know what those numbers on the graph are.. Even though your first post you admited like me that they were hard to belive

Yet you came up with some 50kph number out of thin air

When it is actully only around 11kph, based on the numbers you want to use

Now who needs glasses? LOL!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:42 PM
David198502's Avatar
David198502 David198502 is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,536
Default
well at first i only took a short glance at it.then i had a closer look after you came up with your 11kph...
those 11kph you see is actually the difference between the DB601 and the DB605 engine...
now who needs glasses?lol(never thought i would ever use this abbreviation)
__________________
Last edited by David198502; 10-31-2011 at 06:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2011, 06:54 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
well at first i only took a short glance at it.then i had a closer look after you came up with your 11kph...
those 11kph you see is actually the difference between the DB601 and the DB605 engine...
Ah.. ok, your right! I don't read German very well but that does make more sence now!

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
now who needs glasses?lol(never thought i would ever use this abbreviation)

+1

sorry ace if i upset you...that surely wasnt my intention with this thread
Trust me, been doing this along time.. Would take more that that to upset me!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.