Legal issues over depicting World War Two equipment

[Viking]

From another thread:


“Excuse me if I seem to be bashing again but I can’t get my head around the “logic” of the firms involved.

The nation is under attack: and the citizens and companies are threatened: the citizens ask the companies to produce products that will make it possible for the citizens to protect the nation and the companies from that threat: the citizens pays for them in full: the companies are protected and makes a profit; the citizens pay in both gold and in blood: jet the companies owns it all!?

I know that it’s often a huge gap between law and moral but this…

*Viking shakes his head*

Viking”

I seriously didn’t want to bash or insult anyone I just described a very (extremely) naïve perception of the “problem”. Like I sad I know it’s a huge gap.

Let’s not go ballistic or nationalistic or start a flame thread here. But it sure would be nice to root out all the rumours and guesses and get some real hard facts on this topic.

Viking