![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Considering that the post was made just under two years ago when DirectX 11 development was fairly new, maybe it was made before Oleg and Co encountered hard to solve problems? Maybe trying to implement DirectX 11 cause the massive delays to the release of this sim? Rather than a lie, could it be possible that Oleg was being over optimistic about the possibility of developing for it? Theres a thing, what other combat flight sim has Direct X 11 at the moment? As far as I know ROF and DCS A10 doesn't at the current time. Who knows? I sure don't! Cheers! PS I had a great time online the other week! Hope to see you online again soon! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes me to Skoshi, ive been working on getting our own server up and running, trying to create a real nice map. No doubt I will catch up with you soon.
Myself and Skoshi are proof that you can disagree about many things, but ultimately still have respect and fly together quite happily whilst having heaps of fun. S! Skoshi. ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think Tree's earlier post quashes the joint 'efforts' of AoA and robtek.
It all links back to my first post (which this duo seem to forget) I'm not trying to be rude and seek some sort of endeavour of argument, but the point is clear: if it says DX-11 on the box, people will expect the game to be using those features. It is misleading. Aside from whether it is supported for implementation in the future, the team are in no credible postition to paste a list of features onto the box that can be supported. In reality, a shopping list of features are supported, but not implemented. That is misleading to any newcomers. The point is uncounterable. Now Lobi, as well, has posted tangible evidence to support this argument. In the face of statements, or quoted posts being taken out of context? It's clear we have taken the effort to support our claims. Have you? Please gents, it's clear there's a diversion of opinions. The childish point-scoring: 'hey, we beat you, let's talk to another user about how stupid these 'negative people' are' is just ridiculous ![]() It really is pathetic. Grow up and understand that people will have different opinions on issues surrounding the game. For a BoB sim, there are various areas that mean more to certain people than others. It's not too hard to understand. It's just ridiculous being name-called just for saying something constructive about how the terrain is wrong, or another feature. Luthier has already posted by saying this: "If we didn't listen to criticism, Il-2 would never in a million years get to where it did back in 2001. So please keep it coming. " now show me where he has said: 'if we didn't read a minroity of whining posts from members arguing against these horribly negative people, Il-2 would never in a million years get to where it did back in 2001.' have fun with that search! ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|