![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the tomshardware.com review of the FX-8150.
"In the very best-case scenario, when you can throw a ton of work at the FX and fully utilize its eight integer cores, it generally falls in between Core i5-2500K and Core i7-2600K—which is where it should appear all of the time given a price tag between those two most relevant competitors." "Sometimes FX manages to outperform the higher-end -2600K, but other times it’s embarrassingly bested by its predecessor in threaded workloads." And that's the biggest problem for BD, it falls on it's face when the workload isn't well-threaded. Hopefully AMD gets this fixed for next years "Piledriver". But until then, for gaming: Intel i5/i7 = Intense/High-End level gaming. AMD Phenom II = Medium/high level gaming. AMD Athlon II = Budget/Medium level gaming. AMD Llano = Entry-level gaming. Post Edited to clarify that in my little chart, I'm only talking about how the CPU's gaming performance; if I was talking about multitasking or something else, then the Phenom II would be higher up. Last edited by BaronBonBaron; 10-15-2011 at 04:35 PM. |
|
|