![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i think im gonna get a yamaha special 250
but whats the cheapest car you can get with no hood?
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by baronWastelan; 10-05-2011 at 09:25 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry guys, I stand by my post.
I've done lots of track days in the past. In my job I drive lots of different newer and older exotics and sports cars. The 911 has morphed into a GT car, especially the portly water cooled versions. There is no getting around that. For my taste the only new Porsches that come close to the essence of what a sports car is are the Cayman S and the Boxter Spyder. Personally if I was going to own a 911 the only one I would consider is the RS America. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the newer 911s are bad cars, they are not, but I find them lacking in soul. I can say the same thing about the newer Aston Martins as well. Wonderful cars, but dull. On the flip side I had the '63 E-Type from the collection out on the road today and it made me feel like I was driving. Really driving. I could feel the rear end thinking about stepping out just a little as that wonderful 3.8 litre six oozed torque through the contact patches coming out of a tight right hander. Tiny correction in the steering and squeeze the go pedal a bit more, clip the apex, squirt out and select fourth... Ah... Glorious... ![]() ![]() Me at work.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I doubt you could list 5 power-train and suspension differences between the RS America and a "'96 911", or how many of those components are interchangeable between the 2. Wonder if you're conflating "'96 911" with "996"?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The RS is a lot lighter. No AC or electric doo dads. And no computer nanny messing with the brakes or throttle either. Like I said, the 993 is not a bad car, but soul stirring it is not.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't seem to have a computer nanny on my 993 messing with my brakes or throttle. I have a cable connecting accelerator pedal to the throttle body on the engine, same as RS America (964). I have hydraulic brake master cylinder with ABS, same as 964 RS America. Electric power windows, same as .... [guess].
Tell us the differences between the two models in the M64 engine. For bonus points, list 2 or 3 features from the 993 engine that many 964 owners install. But, the 993 is newer, and therefore more "high tech", and therefore "watered down". ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I didn't make this post this to argue with you.
I found the car boring, porky, and not to my liking. Certainly not as fun as the early cars. It's easily 500 pounds overweight, and has a lot of stuff that sports cars don't need. But then it's a GT car now, so what do I know. To each his own.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.insideline.com/features/t...-all-time.html
And the answer is: Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
|
|