Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2011, 08:27 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
i was REALLY disapointed with RO2. i didnt play RO1, but i was all excited to finally have waht looked to be a realistic objecitve based, Teamwork WW2 shooter.

well, it all went way preatty fast. Quickscoping, ubber weapon accuarecy, combined with MW2 sized maps resulted with it being just another run 'n shoot everithing that moves.

GFX's wise it was also a let down. it suffers the same problem of AA3, looks good at close, but 25 meters way stuff looks out of focus.
I don't really agree on the uber accuracy part. I can shoot a paper figure in the head at 300 meters with a G3 (prone) even without a scope and the maximum kill range I've had in RO2 is 200 meters so not problems for me at least. I'm better IRL

I can agree that the maps are a bit small, but if I want big maps I play ARMA so this is a nice "quick option"...

Regarding the graphics I'm old and started playing on the Spectrum 16kb so I'm really not that picky even though I've played most major titles since 1984
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2011, 09:11 PM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex View Post
I don't really agree on the uber accuracy part. I can shoot a paper figure in the head at 300 meters with a G3 (prone) even without a scope and the maximum kill range I've had in RO2 is 200 meters so not problems for me at least. I'm better IRL

I can agree that the maps are a bit small, but if I want big maps I play ARMA so this is a nice "quick option"...

Regarding the graphics I'm old and started playing on the Spectrum 16kb so I'm really not that picky even though I've played most major titles since 1984
True, but im preatty sure you cant hit a thign at 50 meters instantanely after zooming in your sights. that is, you need time to adjust your eye to tgunsight, 1 to 3 seconds. its not instantaneus.

arma, its too big. RO ist too small. 2x2 km would be my expectations.

Regarding graphics. im ok with "bad" graphics. waht it dont like at all is having multiple levels of quality in the same game. its like having bad CGI in a movie. looks ugly and unnatural.

Last edited by pupo162; 09-30-2011 at 09:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2011, 02:52 AM
trumps trumps is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 221
Default

this is the one i am waiting for, Iron Front Liberation 1944. a stand alone, made using a tweaked ARMA II engine, this will be special, if you havent seen it check out the trailer! big open spaces, is what i love, nearly everything else seems to be a rail shooter!

http://www.deepsilver.com/en/game-vi...16/iron-front/

trailer


Craig
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.