Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > CoD Multiplayer

CoD Multiplayer Everything about multiplayer in IL-2 CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old 09-21-2011, 12:17 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AARPRazorbacks View Post
Obviously I do get it.
You do not want the IIa in any server because you like to make yourself feel good by shooting down the under powered Spitfires.

The IIa was a better fighter then the 109 in a dog fight. did that mean thy never got shot down no.
When I first got into MP I knew that the Spitfires where not what thy should be.
I was told by the 109 pilots that it was not the plane but that the 109 pilots where better then the Spitfire pilots and the 109 where modeled right.

Now we hear that the 109 are not right.

When a pilot went out on his own during the war thy would be in big trouble if thy made it back with out being jumped by a group of enemy planes.

When thy talk about advantage thy where talking about numbers.

The 109 pilots would take on the IIa if and only if thy had the numbers to do so because thy knew it was a better plane.

What are you going to do when thy make the FM of the I and Ia fly like thy should?
Then theyll fix the 109 along with them and the 109 will still remain the better climber and faster plane. Like it really was.
And the balance remains like it currently is.

Winger
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 09-21-2011, 12:22 PM
AARPRazorbacks AARPRazorbacks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SEC, USA. WPS
Posts: 222
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winger View Post
Then theyll fix the 109 along with them and the 109 will still remain the better climber and faster plane. Like it really was.
And the balance remains like it currently is.

Winger
You are right with the IIa in the severe's to give the balance.
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 09-21-2011, 12:34 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AARPRazorbacks View Post
You are right with the IIa in the severe's to give the balance.
Hopeless. I am done with you Have fun in your UFO

winger
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 09-21-2011, 01:38 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AARPRazorbacks View Post
Obviously I do get it.
You do not want the IIa in any server because you like to make yourself feel good by shooting down the under powered Spitfires.
That's the point. The 109 undermodelled too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AARPRazorbacks View Post
You are right with the IIa in the severe's to give the balance.
Read it slowly : The performance of Spit I, Spit Ia, Hurri, 109 E-1, E-3, E-4 is undermodelled. The Spit II is not.
This is a huge and unfair advantage in parameters also, which should not. Do you understand why this problem? Relative to each other, there are no differences between the other aircrafts. The RAF planes turn better, the 109 climb better, and fastest a bit. The dive speeds almost equal. Spit is better at a manoeuvring ability, the Hurri more sluggish than the 109...
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here

Last edited by VO101_Tom; 09-21-2011 at 01:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 09-21-2011, 01:46 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

I fear you can go over and over and over and over this same topic and 'some' people just do not get it and STILL think this is a big conspiracy to make it easier for the Blue side..

They really DO NOT get the whole ''undermoddeled/incorrect FM'' bit
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 09-21-2011, 02:03 PM
trumps trumps is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 221
Default

dont waste your time trying to spell it out to him guys. i sort of miss the IIa now, especially when this flyer01 was online, he was my favorite person to vulch, lost track of the amount of times i pk'ed him, his little spaceship rarely blasted off

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 09-21-2011, 02:04 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
I fear you can go over and over and over and over this same topic and 'some' people just do not get it and STILL think this is a big conspiracy to make it easier for the Blue side..

They really DO NOT get the whole ''undermoddeled/incorrect FM'' bit
I dont think hes THAT dumb thou. I just think he doesnt WANT to get it
Or is it possible that he really is?

Winger
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 09-21-2011, 02:16 PM
conio conio is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 56
Default

Ok, lets see if this example makes people understand....

You have 3 cars:
1.- Ferrari
2.- Porsche
3.- Lamborghini

Ferrari and Porsche have the engine of a Volkswagen beetle (the old ones).
Lamborghini has a 12 cylinder 400HP engine.

Obviously, the Lamborghini has the correct engine but the Ferrari and Porsche are no match for it, making it an unfair race.
There are two solutions for this:
1.- Install the VW engine on the Lamborghini bringing them all to similar and competitive specs.
2.- Install the real engine on the Ferrari and Porsche.

Until 1 or 2 happens, Lamborghini should not be allowed in the race unless is a Lamborghini only race (Option 2 being the preferred/expected/desired/optimal/wanted solution).


The same logic applies if you replace:
Ferrari --> 109
Porsche --> spit I and/or Hurri
Lamborghini -> spit IIa

Last edited by conio; 09-21-2011 at 03:01 PM. Reason: Added option 2 as preferred solution.
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 09-21-2011, 02:42 PM
trumps trumps is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 221
Default

option 2 is the only real solution, this is a sim so it's got to be!
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 09-21-2011, 03:28 PM
drewpee drewpee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 427
Default

LOL , The thought of a Ferrari with a ac 1300cc vdub engine is just too much for my mind to comprehend. I'd pay money to see a race of this sort. Maybe Top Gear could do it as a challenge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.