Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > CoD Multiplayer

CoD Multiplayer Everything about multiplayer in IL-2 CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:52 PM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

Stop whining. dont like, make your own server.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:58 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
Stop whining. dont like, make your own server.
Go fart around elsewhere Pupo Explanation: German Pups = Fart.
Ah and let me guess. You fly allied side mostly? Since noone that prefers flying german has left big fun since this practice started. Just take a look at the numbers. Post this habbit the sides were most of the time even with some runaways to the one or the other side. Now there are jusut a few Germans and believe me even those will vanish if it stays like that. They simply start flying allied. And only the noobs that dont know it better jump into the coffin named 109. Even a bad Spit pilot in a IIa must be just stupid to loose a fight against a 109 on even energylevels. Even if the 109 is an ace.

Winger

Last edited by Winger; 09-07-2011 at 09:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-07-2011, 09:11 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winger View Post
Even a bad Spit pilot in a IIa must be just stupid to loose a fight against a 109 on even energylevels. Even if the 109 is an ace.
If the 109 pilot is an ace, he will not enter a fight with a Spitfire IIa with the same energy...

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-07-2011, 09:38 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

i am actually wondering if anyone is thinking that there should be a difference in flight performance between the 109E-1, -3 & -4............

1C should programm them with the absolute same FM! IMHO
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-2011, 09:48 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
i am actually wondering if anyone is thinking that there should be a difference in flight performance between the 109E-1, -3 & -4............

1C should programm them with the absolute same FM! IMHO
Who said otherwise? It should have the same FM. but actually it doesnt matter since no matter what 109 you fly. The Spit IIa outturns, outdives, outruns and outclimbs you. THERE IS NO POINT IN FLYING AGAINST IT!

Winger
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-07-2011, 09:55 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

i just made the post because perhaps some missiondesigners thought " hey, there is a new 109 with a higher number . it has to be a better plane perfomancewise , hence the higher number. Lets put the Spit II in together with this E -4".... or something similar
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-08-2011, 11:27 AM
ChrisDNT ChrisDNT is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 298
Default

You're surprised ?

Just wait for the Focke Wulf 190 A being dominated by the Spit V
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-07-2011, 10:10 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehawk View Post
There should be a slight difference, for different weights, and I understand (where's Kurfurst when you need him?) that the E-3's engines produced about 75 more HP. Not alot I know, but a little better.

The Spit II is a bit more than 100kph faster than any current 109, so it is a bit of an uneven matchup. Spits should be faster up high, not down low, and not to the extent that they can outclimb the 109s, even down low.
all 109s in game has the same armourequipment......so, their general weight is the same.
the E-1 had some few kilos less because of the armament.
Production , maintenance and pilotweight differences simle made this small difference to zero in performance.
What engine they had? DB 601A-1 or the little bit more powerfull DB601Aa, well, both is possible for all variants.


the decissions 1C made in the past about fightervariants are questionable anyway.

Spit I and Hurri I both with Rotol CSP and 100 octan fuel.
Bf109E-1& -4 (plus their -/Bs), both with Db601Aa
would have be my release set.......

later added with Spitfire II, Hurricane II and Bf109E-4/N


british two speed propeller fighters, 109E-3 , were total nonsense decissions IMHO!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-07-2011, 10:16 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I really enjoy watching the 109 whiners in their ever persistent quest to re-write history.

Cry me a freaking river.

This nonsense has been going on since the dawn of flight simulation. A sub set of German aircraft fanboys pushing their agenda and history be damned.

I laugh in your general direction.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-07-2011, 10:19 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
I really enjoy watching the 109 whiners in their ever persistent quest to re-write history.

Cry me a freaking river.

This nonsense has been going on since the dawn of flight simulation. A sub set of German aircraft fanboys pushing their agenda and history be damned.

I laugh in your general direction.

Dude grow up this is not whiners its a fact, currently the only aircraft that has a realistic FM is the Spit Mk2... IRL it could turn better, it could climb better (i think) but currently its MUCH MUCH faster than a 109 as well lol .
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.