|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: Would you be willing to pay for additional contend? | |||
| yes |
   
|
93 | 36.19% |
| no |
  
|
125 | 48.64% |
| not sure |
  
|
39 | 15.18% |
| Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
08-29-2011, 10:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
#3
08-29-2011, 10:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The wording should have included the state of the sim, as in:
Would you pay for additional contend for cod as it is now. or: Would you pay for additional contend for cod when the patch works as announced. The way it is worded now it is biased towards the negative, imo.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects 
|
|
#4
08-29-2011, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would I pay for content? Depends, if there's a huge number of fixes and performance boosters included and better sound, then yes, absolutely.
I can't wait for the next game in the IL2 series, but they got to fix this stuff first.
|
|
#5
08-30-2011, 02:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Like many on here I voted Yes, but that is conditional on a much improved sim. I personally am not interested in the ROF pay per plane model. I would pay for larger theater wide expansions with multiple aircraft like AEP, Pacific Fighters, PE2, and 1946, (which of course are more expensive than just paying for planes) and new maps, I personally like that model better and feel it is more suited to simulations.
JD AKA_MattE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler Intel X25-M 160GB SSD Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB MSI R7970 OC ATI Catalyst 12.3 KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W COOLER MASTER HAF 932 MajorBoris "Question: Do you forum more than you fly?" raaaid "i love it here makes me look normal"
|
|
#6
08-30-2011, 02:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will never ever again buy aircraft one at a time. It's not the way to properly develop a flight sim. All it does is create income flow with no incentive to do anything but make more aircraft models, as that is where the money is for the developer that uses such a lame scheme.
What I will do is buy addons that supply aircraft, land and sea vehicles, and maps that allow for their use in a proper historical context. This is real value for money, and not just feeding an addiction for new aircraft.
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
|
|
#7
08-30-2011, 07:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes once the game is working condition. At least beta release level. Not the Alpha ATM.
And I'd like it per expansion, not pay for individual planes. And keep making the game better with each expansion. +1 on this as other people have said it. Its not just the plane but the whole game that makes a game great, the theater development, ground vehicles, ships, buildings, environment, troops, AI . . . That's like going to the store and paying a few quid for an egg, everyone knows you buy them by the dozen for several Of course greedy capitalist figs try to hog and sell piece by piece. that model is weaksauce. So is the Starcraft 2 and half life 2 spanned release idea. Starcraft 2 was originally going to be released as one big game with all three races just like the original with two expansions in the works. but now Blizzard realizes their crazy fans will pay 20$ a month (for two accounts) for a 7 year old game with lame graphics, that's been haxorz to hell and rampant bliz employee GM abuse (game master) so leet peeps can max level in a day . . . so they split their game into 3 parts sold separably wait 2 years between each . . . and then their two + expansions.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
