customer satisfaction poll

[Blackdog_kt]

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

Blackdog

Would you like to be informed in a regular and effective way on patch progress

How can that be misleading, yes or no?? very simple really, the reason the question is being asked is because at present we are not being informed, so i fail to see how the poll is some kind trap for unsuspecting members.

Blackdog - another long post, I dont speak for anyone other than myself its just that as you can see 145 people currently share my view and only 14 share yours, that makes you part of a minority, I cant help that it is what it is. Also the poill does not ask for 'weekly' updates as you suggested it clearly ask for regular.

Lastly, regarding my predictions I see you have jumped on the same bandwagon as others suggesting I predicted eveything, that is wrong if you bothered to research this particular attack on me by reading my old posts you would see I concentrated my predictions in certain key areas, Im dissappointed that you have failed to gather some factual evidence, I had this discussion recently and challenged two people to look at my old posts, they failed to respond, perhaps your the guy to finally expose me?? Good luck.

I don't have the time to look through your posts, if you want to use previous posts to make a point keep bookmarks and link them for me, i'll be happy to reconsider. Until then, i'm not keen on doing your work for you, i have to type another long post of my own


On the actual topic of the thread, this:

Originally Posted by Robert

And yet there have been numerous posts stating categorically just the opposite. They want more information but that doesn't mean they're unsatisfied. The poll (no matter how well meaning) is flawed as it doesn't clearly explain the intention of the voters.

I want updates. I didn't vote for updates. Why? Because the kind and frequency of updates i want is not specified and my vote will be twisted into meaning something it's not meant to. This is not Sternjaeger's fault (i guess he made an honest mistake and just forgot that everything gets dissected down to quarks in this forum ) and i'm not calling him biased.

I'm just saying that if i vote for updates, based on previous interactions with certain members of this board i expect my vote to receive a biased interpretation contrary to the one it has, so i choose not to give them ammunition.

Well, this turned out to be a short post after all