Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-21-2011, 09:17 AM
Opitz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys View Post
Let me make some things clear to you all.

This game has potential, as long as the developers are working on it.

The developers will work on it, as long as they are paid.

They are paid, as long as there is a prospect for potential revenues from future customers.

The future costomers will only exist (considering this is a niche market game) if the current customers are happy about trade's fairness (the release state of the game, current state of the game and the fixing pace in order) to become future customers.

The current customers are profoundly unstatisfied with the release state, generally not satisfied with the current state of the game nor with the pace of developer's fixing the sale-advertised/minimum game necessary broken systems nor with the lack of constant communication regarding the fixing progress.

The developers can't increase this pace, not change the fixing pace over night..


So, what simple logic tells you is the solution to make current customers happy enough in order to secure future sales and eventually fullfil the potential of the game in order to widen the potential-customers area?!!
I think your simple logic fails... Let's just say, there is still a hope among customers, that this game will get repaired over next several months. It is based partly on blind faith, partly on the rest of the customer trust in Luthier's words. As we have one more wise saying in czech - Hope dies as last...

Last edited by Opitz; 07-21-2011 at 09:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-21-2011, 09:21 AM
adonys adonys is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default

obviously, any reasoning, no matter how logic, must bow before the reality's cruel truth..

PS: i think you've missed the third reason which could make customers happy enough
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-21-2011, 09:31 AM
Opitz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys View Post
obviously, any reasoning, no matter how logic, must bow before the reality's cruel truth..

PS: i think you've missed the third reason which could make customers happy enough
I agree that no more words will make anyone here happy anymore... Majority just want to see fixes of bugs reported and classified as urgent by THEM. Next one is - as soon as possible.
I think that last rebellion here was based on perception that nobody in MG really care what they say or want or even bother to communicate with them. This is absolutely understandable. At least for me. Because I understand also, that the most important subject here are customers, it is the central point around everything else should move. At least in my business model.

OK, let's say - to be positive - that plan currently (as this makes only sense to me) - the real plan, is to make Battle of Moscow as soon as possible and focus only on that - in this Addon the most of critical bugs will be repaired. But nobody will care anymore about BOB in this phase... Or, if they are not dependent on the sales revenues, as they can have some sponsor in golden mine owner from Siberia, they will fiddle and mess around with BOB only for the rest of this year...

Last edited by Opitz; 07-21-2011 at 09:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2011, 11:36 AM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opitz View Post
OK, let's say - to be positive - that plan currently (as this makes only sense to me) - the real plan, is to make Battle of Moscow as soon as possible and focus only on that - in this Addon the most of critical bugs will be repaired. But nobody will care anymore about BOB in this phase... Or, if they are not dependent on the sales revenues, as they can have some sponsor in golden mine owner from Siberia, they will fiddle and mess around with BOB only for the rest of this year...
You fly other IL-2 titles?

If so, your statement above are really poor. All IL-2 titles are INTEGRATED. MG will not "abandon" CloD for Battle of Moscow...

You really need to be quiet and stop the nonsense. Battle of Moscow will use the same engine as CloD. "Focus" in Battle of Moscow is "focus" in CloD.

I believe this is obvious. But as far I can see, isn't to some...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:17 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys View Post
obviously, any reasoning, no matter how logic, must bow before the reality's cruel truth..
Truth?

You mean FACTS? You never gave any.

You mean whiner-fabricated truth? I wholeheartedly agree.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:11 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys View Post
The current customers were profoundly unstatisfied with the release state, generally not satisfied with the current state of the game nor with the pace of developer's fixing the sale-advertised/minimum game necessary broken systems nor with the lack of constant communication regarding the fixing progress.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you don`t represent the customers. No one has given you a voice for this. Please do not post false information. We have many satisfied customers too.

Quote:
The developers can't change the current game's state over night, nor increase the fixing pace..
Glad you finally came to understand that 4 months after release.

Quote:
So, what simple logic tells you is the solution to make current customers happy enough in order to secure future sales (and eventually fullfil the potential of the game in order to widen the potential-customers area)?!!
Actually, many posts including the most recent ones by American customers show that many people do not transform into screaming brats overnight. Some poeple actually remember what 1C did with IL2 and they also give them some more time. Further development of this particular title can never be a part of your negative only contribution here.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:06 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opitz View Post
Because the real potential is missed by miles... And no miracle happened during US release. And it is quite hard to swallow for almost everyone here...
There you have it.
Whiners demanding miracles flat out.
Wrong again. This game is fulfilling its potential but you don`t seem to appreciate it and trying to diminish it. You will not succeed.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:23 PM
Opitz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
There you have it.
Whiners demanding miracles flat out.
Wrong again. This game is fulfilling its potential but you don`t seem to appreciate it and trying to diminish it. You will not succeed.
If that so, why there is such poor sales there now? Why the old customers are not coming back? Why there is only 22 ppl playing it online in "primetime"?

It is not about me or you, you didn't get it yet, right? How ridiculous is your "You will not succeed"...

If you, I mean YOU, enjoy this game in current state - I think this say a lot...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:26 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opitz View Post
If that so, why there is such poor sales there now? Why the old customers are not coming back? Why there is only 22 ppl playing it online in "primetime"?
Poor sales. Ok. Tell me why you think they are poor and what data do you have to judge it as poor?

The ridiculous statement with mp session numbers has been explained by other posters before and proves nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:48 PM
Opitz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Poor sales. Ok. Tell me why you think they are poor and what data do you have to judge it as poor?

The ridiculous statement with mp session numbers has been explained by other posters before and proves nothing.
So because the sales were so high or as planned, you can buy it with discounts now on many different sites and shops, right? Except Steam...

What about reviews from official games site or tv shows? Did they say in unissono - man this is a gem, go and buy it? Some even couldn't make a review!!!

So let's turn it around - why do you think sales are not poor? How you know?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.