Quote:
Originally Posted by Phazon
Sternjaeger tell us what we are supposed to talk about. We can't discuss our MP experiences because it doesn't work properly. We can't discuss our SP experiences because there is no real SP to talk about. Not everyone wants to get into the FMB or make movies.
The only thing left to discuss is bugs and speculation as to what on earth is going on since we have heard nothing for 18 days. The only person to blame is 1C for not keeping us informed as to when we'll get our sim game.
|
I agree, and as a customer I feel ripped off too, but a few things are obvious:
1) we won't get our money back
2) there's nothing on par with this sim, buggy as it is, at the moment.
3) the game will get better, like other sims did, with a suffering start and an improving quality.
it's not the whining per se, it's the elaborated stuff like "here what tracers look like, I've seen them in Pearl Harbor" or "this game is XXXX" and then you look at the user's rig and realise he has a good one for IL-2, but not for CoD.
And yes, I'm sure that if there was more feedback and interaction from Luthier & Co. there would be way less whining, but guys, stop for a second and look at the potential of the game you have installed.. it's infinitely superior to ANY simulation out there, this is a fact. Improvements will come with better rigs and patches, I think we're just at the troubled dawn of a superb simulation, and that's probably what Luthier is worried about
: it's not the petty stuff, it's the grand scheme. Picking up on Oleg's role must have been a HUGE challenge, and yes, most of us think he's making a HUGE mistake in not delivering serious, regular updates, but all we can do is wait and hope they'll polish what I look at as a rough diamond.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BP_Tailspin
And the root cause of this is ?
|
The root cause is the users and the lack of updates. I always looked at ww2 sims as a niche market, and I'm glad that there actually are a lot of people that find it fascinating. I also appreciate that not all of us are literate on the subject, both under a historical an technical point of view, so why going with all the technical/historical speculation, based mostly on one's assumption?! Reading that day after day is really really annoying..
Quote:
|
Some people just have nothing positive to say …
|
agreed, so instead of whining on something that has been flagged already, they can
search the forum for similar threads, read and STFU..
Quote:
|
Your not complaining are you … I think the moderators do an excellent job.
|
opinions man, it's yours vs mine, I think that mods are doing a random job, it's like they check only every now and then, give a general rather gross sweep (without following the forum rules themselves: before ANY banning they should send a warning) and go back to whatever they're doing..
Quote:
“I'm only expressing my personal view” as are others, but there views are different than yours, that’s all …
Come on Sternjaeger …
|
I take views and respect everybody's, as long as they're literate and make sense. I reckon there should be an option to filter posts according to forum members' age..
07-19-2011, 12:49 PM
Hybrid Mode
